2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-016-1411-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive bioacoustic analysis suggests introgression across Pleistocene land bridges in Mixornis tit-babblers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this species displays greater mtDNA than nuclear DNA structure on Borneo (Lim et al 2017). It also has complex relationships with Pin-striped Tit-Babbler M. gularis (Cros & Rheindt 2017), its closest relative outside of Borneo, decreasing the reliability of conclusions based on a few mtDNA comparisons of a limited sample of specimens. White-necked Babbler Stachyris leucotis.-The Meratus, Sarawak and Sabah populations appear to form distinct clades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, this species displays greater mtDNA than nuclear DNA structure on Borneo (Lim et al 2017). It also has complex relationships with Pin-striped Tit-Babbler M. gularis (Cros & Rheindt 2017), its closest relative outside of Borneo, decreasing the reliability of conclusions based on a few mtDNA comparisons of a limited sample of specimens. White-necked Babbler Stachyris leucotis.-The Meratus, Sarawak and Sabah populations appear to form distinct clades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Given the Isler criterion's known conservatism and susceptibility to type II errors under low sample sizes (Isler et al 1998, Rheindt et al 2011, Cros & Rheindt 2017, we believe that the detection of complete diagnosability in at least one character between Rote and Sumba Myzomelas points to deep levels of bioacoustic differentiation in two species that have remained morphologically similar.…”
Section: Vocal Differencesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In our classification of call types, we interpreted an unbroken vocal segment as an "element", whereas a "motif" was taken to be a collection of one to multiple elements that are repeated in an almost identical fashion (Rheindt et al 2011, Harris et al 2014 Vocal parameters were also analysed using Isler et al's (1998) criterion for bioacoustic species delimitation (henceforth referred to as the Isler criterion). The Isler criterion has previously been applied successfully to distinguish among vocally divergent lineages of Asian and AustraloPacific doves, nightjars, bulbuls, owls, and babblers (Sangster & Rozendaal 2004, Rheindt et al 2011, Garg et al 2016, Gwee et al 2017, Cros & Rheindt 2017 (Fig. 3), a bioacoustic comparison using the Isler criterion was not performed based on low sample size across these call types.…”
Section: Bioacoustic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where t i refers to the t-score at the 95 th percentile of the distribution for n -1 degrees of freedom. The Isler criterion was initially devised for New World antbirds (Isler et al, 1998), but has been applied across various songbirds (Cros & Rheindt, 2017;Prawiradilaga et al, 2018;Gwee et al, 2019b) and non-oscines (Sangster & Rozendaal, 2004;Gwee et al, 2017;Gwee et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Bioacoustic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%