2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.11466
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive 4D Abelian 2-Form Theory: Nilpotent Symmetries from the (Anti-)Chiral Superfield Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, the Lagrangian densities L (b 1 ) and L (b 2 ) have been derived in a completely different manner in our present endeavor if we compare our present derivation against the derivation in our earlier work [12] where we have exploited the method of trial and error. Second, the CF-type restrictions: B + B + m φ = 0 and B + B + m φ = 0 are same as in our earlier work [12,21] but the other two restrictions in (47) are different. Third, if we stick with the CF-type restrictions that have been derived from the superfield approach to BRST formalism in context of 4D Abelian 2-form massless and massive gauge theories [18,21], we find that the other two restrictions of (47) are: B µ + Bµ + ∂ µ φ = 0 and B µ + Bµ + ∂ µ φ = 0.…”
Section: Linearized Versions Of the Lagrangian Densities: Auxiliary F...mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…First of all, the Lagrangian densities L (b 1 ) and L (b 2 ) have been derived in a completely different manner in our present endeavor if we compare our present derivation against the derivation in our earlier work [12] where we have exploited the method of trial and error. Second, the CF-type restrictions: B + B + m φ = 0 and B + B + m φ = 0 are same as in our earlier work [12,21] but the other two restrictions in (47) are different. Third, if we stick with the CF-type restrictions that have been derived from the superfield approach to BRST formalism in context of 4D Abelian 2-form massless and massive gauge theories [18,21], we find that the other two restrictions of (47) are: B µ + Bµ + ∂ µ φ = 0 and B µ + Bµ + ∂ µ φ = 0.…”
Section: Linearized Versions Of the Lagrangian Densities: Auxiliary F...mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Second, the CF-type restrictions: B + B + m φ = 0 and B + B + m φ = 0 are same as in our earlier work [12,21] but the other two restrictions in (47) are different. Third, if we stick with the CF-type restrictions that have been derived from the superfield approach to BRST formalism in context of 4D Abelian 2-form massless and massive gauge theories [18,21], we find that the other two restrictions of (47) are: B µ + Bµ + ∂ µ φ = 0 and B µ + Bµ + ∂ µ φ = 0. Hence, the (±) signs associated with thee (pseudo-)scalar fields (e.g.…”
Section: Linearized Versions Of the Lagrangian Densities: Auxiliary F...mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations