2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10511-019-09597-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masses and Metallicity of Nova Envelopes with Carbon-Oxygen (CO) and Oxygen-Neon-Magnesium (ONeMg) White Dwarfs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations of the steady-burning phase following the TNR (Section 2.1.2) imply that ejecta mass scales inversely with WD mass, as theoretically predicted (Wolf et al 2013, Henze et al 2014. However, other observational estimates of ejecta mass consistently yield values more than an order of magnitude greater than theoretically predicted, and show only weak correlations with other nova properties (Roy et al 2012, Tarasova 2019. Much of this discrepancy may be addressed by more accurately and consistently correcting for the effects of clumping and aspherical geometries in the ejecta, which would drive observational estimates downward (Ribeiro et al 2014, Wendeln et al 2017.…”
Section: Early Uv-x-ray Flash From the Thermonuclear Runawaymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Observations of the steady-burning phase following the TNR (Section 2.1.2) imply that ejecta mass scales inversely with WD mass, as theoretically predicted (Wolf et al 2013, Henze et al 2014. However, other observational estimates of ejecta mass consistently yield values more than an order of magnitude greater than theoretically predicted, and show only weak correlations with other nova properties (Roy et al 2012, Tarasova 2019. Much of this discrepancy may be addressed by more accurately and consistently correcting for the effects of clumping and aspherical geometries in the ejecta, which would drive observational estimates downward (Ribeiro et al 2014, Wendeln et al 2017.…”
Section: Early Uv-x-ray Flash From the Thermonuclear Runawaymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Observations of the steady-burning phase following the TNR ( §2.1.2) imply that ejecta mass scales inversely with WD mass, as theoretically predicted (Wolf et al 2013, Henze et al 2014. However, other observational estimates of ejecta mass consistently yield values more than an order of magnitude greater than theoretically predicted, and show only weak correlations with other nova properties (Roy et al 2012, Tarasova 2019. Much of this discrepancy may be addressed by more accurately and consistently correcting for the effects of clumping and aspherical geometries in the ejecta, which would drive observational estimates downward (Ribeiro et al 2014, Wendeln et al 2017.…”
Section: Maccmentioning
confidence: 79%