2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04712.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massage for symptom relief in patients with cancer: systematic review

Abstract: Further well-designed large trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to be able to draw firm conclusions about the efficacy and effectiveness of massage for cancer patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
70
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas conventional mainstream approaches to cancer treatment are evidence based (ie, evaluated for safety and effectiveness using rigorous scientific methodologies), much less is known about the safety and effectiveness of CAM. 3,12,13 In fact, concerns about CAM use include the following: (a) unknown risks of unproven CAM therapies and practices, (b) interference or interaction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, 14,15 (c) CAM practitioners and products are often not regulated, and (d) their use may increase health care costs (public or private) without necessarily improving patient quality of life or well-being. 16 As such, cancer patients who are using or considering CAM might benefit from discussing with their physicians their decisions and desires to use specific CAM therapies, some of which may interfere with or be harmful when used simultaneously with mainstream cancer treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas conventional mainstream approaches to cancer treatment are evidence based (ie, evaluated for safety and effectiveness using rigorous scientific methodologies), much less is known about the safety and effectiveness of CAM. 3,12,13 In fact, concerns about CAM use include the following: (a) unknown risks of unproven CAM therapies and practices, (b) interference or interaction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, 14,15 (c) CAM practitioners and products are often not regulated, and (d) their use may increase health care costs (public or private) without necessarily improving patient quality of life or well-being. 16 As such, cancer patients who are using or considering CAM might benefit from discussing with their physicians their decisions and desires to use specific CAM therapies, some of which may interfere with or be harmful when used simultaneously with mainstream cancer treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by structured interviews, the self-report of anxiety has improved for patients who received massage therapy. This relationship did not exist for the self-report of depression (Wilkinson et al [28]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Egy metaanalízis szerint a masszázsterápia enyhíti a rákkal járó, kiváltképp az operáció következtében fellépő fájdal-mat [44]. Mammacarcinomát túlélő betegeknél a teljestest-masszázs fájdalomcsillapító, depressziót, insomniát és krónikus fáradtság szindrómát mérséklő hatása igazolódott, gyenge evidenciával [45].…”
Section: Masszázsterápiaunclassified