1968
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(68)80020-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transport from a rotating disk into power-law liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N Js (7) However, higher value of the exponent of NIN js obtained in our work suggest that increase of impeller speed is more effectively utilized to cause solid-liquid mass transfer in multiple impeller agitated reactor. (Sq-O.52 (8) which is essentially the same as the one obtained by ladhav and Pangarkar (1991). Figure 7 shows that agreement between experimental data and Eq.…”
Section: Mass Transfer Correlationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…N Js (7) However, higher value of the exponent of NIN js obtained in our work suggest that increase of impeller speed is more effectively utilized to cause solid-liquid mass transfer in multiple impeller agitated reactor. (Sq-O.52 (8) which is essentially the same as the one obtained by ladhav and Pangarkar (1991). Figure 7 shows that agreement between experimental data and Eq.…”
Section: Mass Transfer Correlationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In 1968, the theoretical and experimental studies on the solidliquid mass transfer from a rotating disk in power law non-Newtonian liquids were reported [6]. Then, the power law non-Newtonian fluid model was used in the bubble drag and mass transfer problem [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the reduction in the present data is even more severe than that found by Hansford and Litt. 4 It should be reiterated that the ion in the present study is a much stronger electrolyte than the benzoic acid used by Hansford and Litt. 4 Another interesting feature of Figure 5 is the apparent plateau or slow decrease in D/Do values that ranges from about 0.75% to 2.5% concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%