2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5ee03698d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transport aspects of electrochemical solar-hydrogen generation

Abstract: The conception of practical solar-hydrogen generators requires the implementation of engineering design principles that allow photo-electrochemical material systems to operate efficiently, continuously and stably over their lifetime. At the heart of these engineering aspects lie the mass transport of reactants, intermediates and products throughout the device. This review comprehensively covers these aspects and ties together all of the processes required for the efficient production of pure streams of solar-h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 189 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 The signicant loss of efficiency has been attributed not to the scale-up of the light absorber material (i.e., BiVO 4 ) itself, but more to the ohmic losses and mass-transport (proton/hydroxyl ions) limitations. Several modeling studies have also investigated some of these aspects (substrate losses, ionic drop, mass transfer), [24][25][26][27][28] but the overall quantication of the various loss mechanisms related to scale-up has not been reported. This is important in order to propose and implement appropriate (photo)electrochemical engineering and design strategies in order to overcome the scale-up related losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The signicant loss of efficiency has been attributed not to the scale-up of the light absorber material (i.e., BiVO 4 ) itself, but more to the ohmic losses and mass-transport (proton/hydroxyl ions) limitations. Several modeling studies have also investigated some of these aspects (substrate losses, ionic drop, mass transfer), [24][25][26][27][28] but the overall quantication of the various loss mechanisms related to scale-up has not been reported. This is important in order to propose and implement appropriate (photo)electrochemical engineering and design strategies in order to overcome the scale-up related losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product separation is most commonly achieved using an ion permeable membrane between electrodes. However this has significant disadvantages such as appreciable ohmic losses 9 (particularly in alkaline systems, which have a low conductivity 10 ) and significant costs 11,12 . The placement of the membrane within the cell is further constrained by the compromise between reducing the average path length of ions between electrodes, minimising current density distribution and not block-ing light from being absorbed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass-transfer control through manipulation of the hydrodynamics might be more facile for PEC devices than electrolysers due to typical operational current densities being an order or multiple orders of magnitude lower 9 . This is due to the fact that the current density in a PEC device is proportional to the power intensity of light and this is limited by the solar resource.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When scaling up to sizes beyond 10 cm 2 , mass and ion transport limitations in the solution phase start to severely affect the efficiencies. 44 Optimal membrane size and positioning can be used to minimize diffusion distances while still maintaining good H 2 and O 2 separation, but they introduce additional system complexity and costs. Moreover, one would need to ensure that the membrane does not block the incoming light.…”
Section: Device Designmentioning
confidence: 99%