2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00039-012-0160-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Transport and Uniform Rectifiability

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we characterize the so called uniformly rectifiable sets of David and Semmes in terms of the Wasserstein distance W 2 from optimal mass transport. To obtain this result, we first prove a localization theorem for the distance W 2 which asserts that if µ and ν are probability measures in R n , ϕ is a radial bump function smooth enough so that ∫ ϕ dµ ≳ 1, and µ has a density bounded from above and from below on supp(ϕ), then W 2 (ϕµ, aϕν) ≤ c W 2 (µ, ν), where a = ∫ ϕ dµ ∫ ϕ dν.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely we explore quantitative conditions which imply that a doubling measure in Euclidean space is rectifiable. Recently this question has been addressed by several authors in the context of Ahlfors regular measures (1.5); see [5,27,32,33] in connection with the L 2 -boundedness of Riesz transforms (also see [7,18,24,25], and earlier papers for singular integrals in noninteger dimensions), and a long line of papers between [29] and [17] in connection with harmonic measure. The reader may also be interested in [22] (for rectifiability with even less structure) and the more recent preprints [2,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More precisely we explore quantitative conditions which imply that a doubling measure in Euclidean space is rectifiable. Recently this question has been addressed by several authors in the context of Ahlfors regular measures (1.5); see [5,27,32,33] in connection with the L 2 -boundedness of Riesz transforms (also see [7,18,24,25], and earlier papers for singular integrals in noninteger dimensions), and a long line of papers between [29] and [17] in connection with harmonic measure. The reader may also be interested in [22] (for rectifiability with even less structure) and the more recent preprints [2,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could also have used a slightly smoother version of W 1 ; see Section 5 of [1]. See [38] for additional information about the Wasserstein distance, and [33] for its relationship to W 1 and uniform rectifiability.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To end the paper, in §4, we discuss some connections between Theorem A and Corollary B, and prior work of Léger [Lég99] (Menger curvature), Lerman [Ler03] (curve learning) and Tolsa [Tol12] (mass transport).…”
Section: The Ordinary Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we wish to mention a recent paper by Tolsa [Tol12], which introduced the use of tools from the theory of mass transportation to the theory of quantitative rectifiability. In particular, Tolsa established a new characterization of uniformly rectifiable measures, expressed in terms of the L 2 Wasserstein distance W 2 (·, ·) between probability measures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question, which was my initial motivation for the results of § 1, was asked to me by Xavier Tolsa, who needed such a result for his paper [Tolsa, 2012] on characterizing uniform rectifiability in terms of mass transport. Actually Xavier managed to devise a proof of his own [Tolsa, 2012, Theorem 1.1], but it was quite long (about thirty pages) and involved arguments of multi-scale analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%