Gas Absorption by a Liquid FilmRates of oxygen absorption from turbulent air by a concurrently flowing liquid film were measured in an enclosed 2.54 cm x 30.5 cm rectangular channel. The effect of liquid viscosity is varied by using water and a water-glycerine solution. The results are interpreted by arguing that flow fluctuations in the liquid that control mass transfer are associated with waves of small wavelength at the interface.
SCOPEGas absorption rates of a liquid layer are greatly enhanced by the presence of interfacial shear. Mass transfer coefficients for concurrent gas-liquid flows can be several times larger than those for liquid films that are freely falling down a vertical or inclined wall. The reasons for this are not completely understood. This paper presents results for oxygen absorption under carefully controlled conditions with the goal of investigating the role of an air flow in enhancing transfer rates. Particular insights were gained by varying the liquid viscosity and by accompanying the absorption measurements with measurements of wave properties, interfacial stress, and liquid phase turbulence.Our work was motivated to a large extent by a previous study made by Henstock and Hanratty (1979) in this laboratory. From experiments with water films, they correlated absorption results for a freely falling film (zero gas flow) with the equation K' = 0.0077m"/2 SC-"'.(1)Here K' and m+ are the mass transfer coefficient and the film height, made dimensionless with the friction velocity and the kinematic viscosity, and Sc is the Schmidt number. The rate expression for nonzero gas flow is, in general, quite different from Eq. 1. However, Henstock and Hanratty (Eq. 43 in the cited paper) suggested that at high ratios of the gas to liquid flow rate gas shear controlled mass transfer; the rate then is given by a relation of the same form as Eq. 1 for air and water flowing concurrently downward:K' = 0.0216 mtl" SC 'I2.(2) The present experiments, which are an extension of preliminary work reported by Henstock and Hanratty, allow for the study of oxygen absorption under conditions in which gas shear is completely controlling. They reveal a behavior quite different from Eq. 2. Henstock and Hanratty (1979) argued that turbulence in the liquid controlled mass transfer. Such an interpretation cannot explain the observed effect of liquid flow rate and, in particular, of liquid viscosity on the absorption rate. A more fruitful approach is to relate mass transfer to system variables through their effect on wave properties. A promising theoretical explanation of the effect of waves is that they induce spatial variations of interfacial drag that agitate the liquid close to the interface.
CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE