1984
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450620506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transfer coefficients and amounts of direct‐contact‐catalyst in fluidized catalyst beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the back-mixing controlling region, both the actual reaction rate constant k rA and the mass transfer capacitance coefficient k ob a b can be estimated by comparing the reaction data with the PME model. In the case of the results shown in Figure , k ob a b is estimated to be about 0.3 s -1 , and this value is in good agreement with the data reported by Nozaki et al, Furusaki et al, and Kai et al
9 Effect of contact time on apparent reaction constant in an FCB hydrodealkylation and comparison with the models.
…”
Section: Assessment Of Selectivity In Fcb Reactionssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the back-mixing controlling region, both the actual reaction rate constant k rA and the mass transfer capacitance coefficient k ob a b can be estimated by comparing the reaction data with the PME model. In the case of the results shown in Figure , k ob a b is estimated to be about 0.3 s -1 , and this value is in good agreement with the data reported by Nozaki et al, Furusaki et al, and Kai et al
9 Effect of contact time on apparent reaction constant in an FCB hydrodealkylation and comparison with the models.
…”
Section: Assessment Of Selectivity In Fcb Reactionssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The values of the mass transfer coefficient and the amount of directly contacting particles are derived from the experimental data from ethylene hydrogenation, which are shown in Figure . The experimental analysis of the mass transfer coefficient and the amount of direct contact catalyst were given by Furusaki et al According to our studies, the value of k ob a b increased with U G and varied from 0.2 to 0.8 s -1 when U G was changed from 0.1 to 0.6 m/s. The fraction of direct contacting particles, ν, was below 0.05 and was not affected by gas veolocity .…”
Section: Successive Contact Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the other type of model, the empirical correlations are derived from fluidization experiments. Numerous correlations for determining inter‐phase mass transfer have been developed for bubbling beds or turbulent beds 9, 19–21. In these models, the inter‐phase mass transfer efficiency in the fluidized bed is usually expressed by a volumetric mass transfer coefficient ( k g a i ).…”
Section: Cfd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous correlations for determining inter-phase mass transfer have been developed for bubbling beds or turbulent beds. 9,[19][20][21] In these models, the inter-phase mass transfer efficiency in the fluidized bed is usually expressed by a volumetric mass transfer coefficient (k g a i ). Miyauchi-Masao 9 presented an empirical correlation to predict the volumetric mass transfer coefficient in bubbling and turbulent beds of FCC catalyst for a superficial gas velocity range of 0.1-0.5 m/s, which was expressed as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%