1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02920582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass-transfer and kinetic aspects in continuous bioreactors usingRhodospirillum rubrum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cell culture density is limiting the CO conversion rate only when the cell concentration is low just after inoculation (Henstra 2006). However, because of the low aqueous solubility of CO, gasliquid mass transfer turns out to be the limiting step of CO conversion once the growth of biomass has been sufficient, as the volumetric bioactivity potential of the C. hydrogenoformans culture becomes limited by the dissolved CO available in the liquid (Cowger et al 1992;Kapic et al 2006;Riggs and Heindel 2006;J o n e s2007; Ungerman and Heindel 2007). Hence, for a thermophilic bioprocess to perform at a continuous maximal volumetric activity rate, it is essential for the cell concentration of the microorganism to be optimized to avoid the CO gas-liquid mass transfer limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell culture density is limiting the CO conversion rate only when the cell concentration is low just after inoculation (Henstra 2006). However, because of the low aqueous solubility of CO, gasliquid mass transfer turns out to be the limiting step of CO conversion once the growth of biomass has been sufficient, as the volumetric bioactivity potential of the C. hydrogenoformans culture becomes limited by the dissolved CO available in the liquid (Cowger et al 1992;Kapic et al 2006;Riggs and Heindel 2006;J o n e s2007; Ungerman and Heindel 2007). Hence, for a thermophilic bioprocess to perform at a continuous maximal volumetric activity rate, it is essential for the cell concentration of the microorganism to be optimized to avoid the CO gas-liquid mass transfer limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass transfer characteristics of various reactor configurations have compared by many researchers (Bredwell and Worden, 1998;Cowger et al, 1992;Jones, 2007;Klasson et al, 1990b;Klasson et al, 1991;Klasson et al, 1993a;Munasinghe and Khanal, 2010b;Munasinghe and Khanal, 2014;Orgill et al, 2013;Riggs and Heindel, 2006;Shen et al, 2014a;Yasin et al, 2014). In a STR, the mass transfer coefficient can be increased by increasing 268-280.…”
Section: Bioreactor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on work reported in Spath et al [22], the gas reformer was modeled as a fluidized bed reactor of the same size as the gasifier, with the same specifications except for bed material. Instead of crushed limestone, the catalyst described by Spath et al was used for cost estimation purposes [15]. The reactions taking place in the gas reformer require heat, and this was modeled as coming from a stream of syngas split off from the main stream before the gas reformer.…”
Section: Gas and Tar Reformingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techno-economic analysis of PHA production by the gasification-based biorefinery will allow for the estimation of PHA production cost on a commercial scale and for the evaluation of the economic feasibility of PHA production. In this study, the biorefinery process was simulated based on the recently published information on the production and separation of PHA [4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%