2017
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass spectrometry or immunoassay: est modus in rebus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, immunoassays do not exist for all clinically relevant biomarkers. These assays often reported a lack of reproducibility across different platforms and sometimes a lack of specificity due to the antibodies' cross-reactivity [3]. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry is a powerful alternative analytical technique in bioanalysis because of its good reproducibility and high specificity by eliminating interferences that may impact immunoassays (e.g., cross-reactivity of antibodies) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, immunoassays do not exist for all clinically relevant biomarkers. These assays often reported a lack of reproducibility across different platforms and sometimes a lack of specificity due to the antibodies' cross-reactivity [3]. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry is a powerful alternative analytical technique in bioanalysis because of its good reproducibility and high specificity by eliminating interferences that may impact immunoassays (e.g., cross-reactivity of antibodies) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assays often reported a lack of reproducibility across different platforms and sometimes a lack of specificity due to the antibodies' cross-reactivity [3]. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry is a powerful alternative analytical technique in bioanalysis because of its good reproducibility and high specificity by eliminating interferences that may impact immunoassays (e.g., cross-reactivity of antibodies) [3]. However, LC-MS requires a high initial investment for instrument acquisition and highly experienced operators, and, for intended use in clinical practice, presents a limited sample throughput compared to immunoassays [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they present important limitations when used in the initial study of new biomarkers, especially due to their relatively low specificity, cross-reactivity and lack of agreement between platforms. 26 LC-MS/MS emerges as the methodology of choice to evaluate the potential of a new biomarker, such as free 25OHD, that depends directly on the determination of DBP concentrations. Therefore, we developed a method for the phenotyping and relative quantification of DBP by LC-MS/MS, which is similar to the one published by Henderson et al 20 However, we decided to focus on paediatric population to elucidate if there are differences in the DBP concentrations among phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 To contribute to clarifying these facts, the aim of this study was to develop a mass spectrometry-based method for phenotype identification and relative quantification of DBP, in order to avoid many of the problems associated with immunoassays. 26…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%