2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass spectrometry detection of protein allergenic additives in emulsion-type pork sausages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three peptides (8–18 amino acids) for each legume species were finally chosen as peptide markers from the group of the candidate marker peptides due to their highest intensities in spiked sausages (test sausage T4, see Table 1 ) applying the optimized MRM method (see Section 3.2 .). The final selected peptides QQEQQLEGELEK [ 25 ], NTLEATFNTR [ 25 , 31 ], and ISSVNSLTLPILR [ 25 ] for lupine blue, NPYHFSSQR [ 31 ] for lupine white, ELTFPGSVQEINR, LSSGDVFVIPAGHPVAVK, and LTPGDVFVIPAGHPVAVR for pea [ 25 ], GTGNLELVAVR [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], FNLAGNHEQEFLR [ 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 ], and WLGLSAEYGNLYR [ 32 , 34 ] for peanut, and SQSDNFEYVSFK [ 23 , 34 , 36 ], EAFGVNMQIVR [ 25 , 34 , 38 , 39 ], and FYLAGNQEQEFLK [ 22 , 23 , 25 , 36 ] for soy have been reported previously in the scientific literature. The identities of each of the 14 marker peptides for alfalfa, broad bean, chickpea, and lentil, as well as lupine white 2 and 3, which have not been reported in the literature until now, were confirmed by spiking in a tryptic digest of an emulsion-type sausage (test sausage T4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three peptides (8–18 amino acids) for each legume species were finally chosen as peptide markers from the group of the candidate marker peptides due to their highest intensities in spiked sausages (test sausage T4, see Table 1 ) applying the optimized MRM method (see Section 3.2 .). The final selected peptides QQEQQLEGELEK [ 25 ], NTLEATFNTR [ 25 , 31 ], and ISSVNSLTLPILR [ 25 ] for lupine blue, NPYHFSSQR [ 31 ] for lupine white, ELTFPGSVQEINR, LSSGDVFVIPAGHPVAVK, and LTPGDVFVIPAGHPVAVR for pea [ 25 ], GTGNLELVAVR [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], FNLAGNHEQEFLR [ 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 ], and WLGLSAEYGNLYR [ 32 , 34 ] for peanut, and SQSDNFEYVSFK [ 23 , 34 , 36 ], EAFGVNMQIVR [ 25 , 34 , 38 , 39 ], and FYLAGNQEQEFLK [ 22 , 23 , 25 , 36 ] for soy have been reported previously in the scientific literature. The identities of each of the 14 marker peptides for alfalfa, broad bean, chickpea, and lentil, as well as lupine white 2 and 3, which have not been reported in the literature until now, were confirmed by spiking in a tryptic digest of an emulsion-type sausage (test sausage T4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to ELISA and PCR, mass spectrometric methods have the advantage of being high-throughput screening tools for the multiplex detection of target proteins in foods [ 19 , 21 ] and are less vulnerable to interferences in complex food matrices [ 19 ]. Only a few analytical methods exist for the HPLC-MS/MS-detection of legumes in meat products, which are limited to soy [ 22 , 23 , 24 ] or lupine, pea, and soy [ 25 ]. However, other legume species are also potential foreign protein sources in meat products, as mentioned before, for which no detection methods to uncover this type of meat adulteration have been available until now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodium dodecyl sulphate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) was performed to compare the protein profiles of oilseed cakes. A sample of 5 mg was solubilized with lysis buffer and SDS‐PAGE analysis was performed according to the procedure described previously 16 . The protein concentration was determined using a 2‐D Quant kit (GE Healthcare Bio‐Sciences, Fairfield, CT, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein digestion was carried out as previously described [ 45 ]. Dried samples (5 mg) were rehydrated in 100 μL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%