2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2005.12.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass spectrometric stability study of binary MSn clusters (S=Si, Ge, Sn, Pb, and M=Cr, Mn, Cu, Zn)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table I, E HOMS -E HOMO is not included in the calculations of M@C 60 clusters, because they are not unreasonable structures, and can not also be viewed as superatomic atoms owe to their negative embedding energies (-0.38, -0.90, -0.83 eV for Zn@C 60 , Cd@C 60 and Hg@C 60 clusters, respectively) and larger R shell (3. 12 cluster, the R shell (3.08 Å) obviously less than the sum of the Van Waals radii of Mn and Sn atoms (1.37+2.17=3.54 Å), and the embedding energy (6.89 eV) significantly bigger than the binding energy (2.64 eV), these results suggest that Mn atom is strongly bonded with outer Sn atom, ie., can be attractively embedded to the centre of Sn 12 , which agrees well with previous studies on the same structure. 7,8,14 The similar analyses on all TM@X 12 and M@X 12 clusters, indicate that TM or M atoms can be attractively embedded to the centre of X 12 too, and suggest that their structures also are extremely stable.…”
Section: A Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 70%
“…As shown in Table I, E HOMS -E HOMO is not included in the calculations of M@C 60 clusters, because they are not unreasonable structures, and can not also be viewed as superatomic atoms owe to their negative embedding energies (-0.38, -0.90, -0.83 eV for Zn@C 60 , Cd@C 60 and Hg@C 60 clusters, respectively) and larger R shell (3. 12 cluster, the R shell (3.08 Å) obviously less than the sum of the Van Waals radii of Mn and Sn atoms (1.37+2.17=3.54 Å), and the embedding energy (6.89 eV) significantly bigger than the binding energy (2.64 eV), these results suggest that Mn atom is strongly bonded with outer Sn atom, ie., can be attractively embedded to the centre of Sn 12 , which agrees well with previous studies on the same structure. 7,8,14 The similar analyses on all TM@X 12 and M@X 12 clusters, indicate that TM or M atoms can be attractively embedded to the centre of X 12 too, and suggest that their structures also are extremely stable.…”
Section: A Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Most of this work has involved the heavy Group 14 element species with the magic cluster size number of 10 and 12. [10][11][12][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] The Co@Ge 10 3− and Fe@Ge 10 3− clusters 30,31 feature an encapsulated pentagonal prismatic structure (D 5h ), whereas the isoelectronic Ni@Pb 10 2− cluster 28,29 prefers the encapsulated bicapped square antiprism structure (D 4d ). Gas phase experiments show that the stannaspherene (Sn 12 2− ) and plumbaspherene (Pb 12 2− ) cages can trap the main-group and transition metals or the f-block elements except of potassium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if there are insufficient Si atoms to fully enclose the dopant atom, basketlike structures are formed [11]. Although mass spectrometry and photodissociation experiments [8,[16][17][18][19] show an enhanced stability of specific transition-metal doped silicon clusters, no single experiment has yet provided detailed information on their structure. Up to now, mainly indirect evidence is found for the formation of symmetric species by photoelectron and x-ray spectroscopy studies [20][21][22] and chemical probe methods [20,23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%