Growing interest in functional genomics [1] has resulted in technological breakthroughs in advanced proteomics, including the intracellular microproteomic analysis of tissues and cells. [2] Quantitative differences in the proteome at the singlecell level can be detected by flow cytometry and fluorescence, [3] as well as mass spectrometry, [4,5] whereas microbial single cell metabolomics has not progressed as rapidly because it involves studying compounds of larger chemical variety, higher turnover rates, and lower molecular weights, coincident with the mass range of common contaminants. Owing to the low copy number of some intracellular proteins and the presence of extracellular noise, isogenic cells can exhibit large differences in their metabolic makeup. [6] This metabolic noise, part of cellular differences, is poorly characterized because it requires the multicomponent analysis of severely volume-limited samples, that is, individual microbial cells. A technique that can capture metabolic variations for a large fraction of the hundreds to thousands of metabolites in single cells or small populations requires a combination of ultra-low limits of detection, high selectivity, and high quantitation capability. [7][8][9] Currently, most metabolic studies are conducted using fluorescence measurements, [10] NMR spectroscopy, [11,12] or mass spectrometry (MS). [8,[13][14][15][16][17][18] Fluorescence measurements provide an ultra-low limit of detection and high selectivity [10] but typically require labeling of selected metabolites, making the process laborious, time consuming, and potentially invasive. NMR and MS are often considered to be complementary techniques; NMR is viewed as a universal detector that does not rely on separation but lacks the sensitivity to analyze single cells. Mass spectrometry is a highly sensitive technique, but to achieve sufficient selectivity and peak capacity, it is often coupled with separation techniques. LC-MS [19] and GC-MS [20][21][22][23] are efficient methods to detect and quantitate thousands of metabolites in complex extracts from large cell populations. These methods require thousands to millions of cells to achieve a high coverage of the metabolome. The analysis of cellular metabolites using secondary ion MS (SIMS), [24,25] MALDI MS, [16,26] and laser desorption ionization (LDI) on nanoporous structures [8] shows promise for large-scale metabolomic studies.Recently, we introduced silicon nanopost arrays (NAPA) as a matrix-free LDI-MS method with highly enhanced ion yields and photonic properties. [27][28][29] A typical NAPA chip is comprised of over two million ordered monolithic silicon nanoposts (see inset in Figure 1 b). The array is defined by the height, H, diameter, D, and periodicity, P, of the posts. Posts of a given diameter exhibit an ion yield resonance at a particular aspect ratio (Supporting Information, Figure S1).In this study, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was chosen for exploring the metabolome in small cell populations and single cells, because the yeast metabolo...