1967
DOI: 10.1021/j100864a601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Spectrometric Investigation of H• and H2 Transfer Reaction of Hydrocarbon Ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence for the occurrence of Hand H2-transfer reactions between an olefin molecule and a saturated hydrocarbon parent ion comes from chemical analysis of the stable end products formed in radiolysis and in photoionization experiments conducted by Ausloos, et al,6~7 and from recent photoionization mass spectrometric studies. [2][3][4] From the results obtained by the photoionization of n-C4Dio-C3H6-02 mixtures,6 the rate constant ratio ki/ks at higher pressures may be derived to be ~0.1.10 Using 0.1 for /c4/fc3, one can obtain ^0.2 as the G value of the propyl radicals resulting from H-transfer reaction 4. Thus, the G value of the n-butane parent ion at 900 mm is estimated to be 1.7, which is the sum of the G values of propane produced via reaction 3 and propyl radicals produced via reaction 4. A recent mass spectrometric study11 has provided evidence that the propane parent ion reacts wdth hydrogen sulfide via charge-and proton-transfer reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence for the occurrence of Hand H2-transfer reactions between an olefin molecule and a saturated hydrocarbon parent ion comes from chemical analysis of the stable end products formed in radiolysis and in photoionization experiments conducted by Ausloos, et al,6~7 and from recent photoionization mass spectrometric studies. [2][3][4] From the results obtained by the photoionization of n-C4Dio-C3H6-02 mixtures,6 the rate constant ratio ki/ks at higher pressures may be derived to be ~0.1.10 Using 0.1 for /c4/fc3, one can obtain ^0.2 as the G value of the propyl radicals resulting from H-transfer reaction 4. Thus, the G value of the n-butane parent ion at 900 mm is estimated to be 1.7, which is the sum of the G values of propane produced via reaction 3 and propyl radicals produced via reaction 4. A recent mass spectrometric study11 has provided evidence that the propane parent ion reacts wdth hydrogen sulfide via charge-and proton-transfer reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C"H2" + RH2+ -C"H2k+2 + R+ (2) where C"H2" and RH2+ denote olefin molecule and alkane parent ion, respectively. Since the yield of the unimolecular hydrogen formed in the gas-phase radiolysis of propane decreased appreciably upon the addition of ethylene, we have also suggested in a previous paper8 that ethylene may interact with unspecified ionic species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we may ass um e th at thi s ion has onl y one s truc ture, CH3CHCHt, at th e tim e o f reac tio n. Th e total ra te co nstants for reac ti on of C:IH t with th e various alkanes giv e n in ta bl e 2 agree well with those obtained for reac tion of C;J Dt formed by photoi onization of propyle ne-dl; with 10 eV photons [lb] in th e presence of C4 a nd C5 alkanes. In th e case of i-butane, for which two reaction c hann els are po ss ible: th e ratio k(H -)/k(Hz ) was found to be 1.26 in the prese nt study, a nd 1.30 in th e pre vi ous in ves ti gati on involvin g C1Dt-Ass uming tha t k, /k2 is depe ndent on the intern al e ner gy of the pro pyle ne io n (a d e pend e nce o n kin e ti c e ne rgy has bee n es ta bli shed [9]) thi s agreeme nt would indi cate th a t th e intern al e ne rgy co ntent of th e pro pyle ne ion res ultin g from th e unim olec ular deco mpos ition of buta ne does not diffe r ap preciably fro m that form e d in th e p hotoio ni zation of pro pylen e at 123_6 nm.…”
Section: Bimolecular Reactions a Alkene Ionsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In the treatment of addiction, repeated controlled experiments demon-repeated controlled experiments demonstrated a consistent recovery and 6-month strated a consistent recovery and 6-month abstinence from drinking in abstinence from drinking in 50-90% of 50-90% of participants after brief psychedelic therapy participants after brief psychedelic therapy (Abramson, 1967;. Another (Abramson, 1967;. Another area where therapy was used successfully area where therapy was used successfully was in relieving pain and anxiety in was in relieving pain and anxiety in terminal cancer .…”
Section: History Of Psychedelic History Of Psychedelic Research Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%