2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass spectrometric investigation of ethanol and acetaldehyde adsorbates electrooxidation on Pt electrocatalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 and Table 2). Finally, the lack of m/z = 15 signal close to the hydrogen evolution region rules out any methane formation, as formerly found for palladium [68] or platinum-based electrocatalyst [69,70]. Based on this study we can conclude that the addition of add-atoms can increase a catalytic activity of palladium for electrooxidation of oxygenated fuels.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 69%
“…6 and Table 2). Finally, the lack of m/z = 15 signal close to the hydrogen evolution region rules out any methane formation, as formerly found for palladium [68] or platinum-based electrocatalyst [69,70]. Based on this study we can conclude that the addition of add-atoms can increase a catalytic activity of palladium for electrooxidation of oxygenated fuels.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 69%
“…This slightly better ethanol oxidation initiation on the bi‐ and tri‐metallic electrocatalysts may be attributed to an enhancement of ethanol adsorption at low potential possibly followed by a better dehydrogenation into acetaldehyde. Based on the knowledge that ethanol adsorption on Pt/C surface is inhibited by the presence of H ad ‐species 20, 33, 34, a modification of Pt electronic structure, as mentioned in the CO‐stripping section, induced by the presence of rhodium, and possibly tin, in the lattice could reduce Pt hydrogen adsorption affinity. The dehydrogenation of the platinum surface by rhodium in Pt‐Rh/C electrocatalysts was already mentioned in 15, 16, 18, 20.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, ethanol adsorbate stripping studies have shown that the C-C bond breaking can occur at potentials as low as E = 0.05 V vs. RHE on Pt-based carbonsupported electrocatalysts. 24,31 As such, spending a longer time between E = 0.07 (CV initial potential) and E = 0.6 V vs. RHE (CO 2 generation initiation) during a slow-scan CV was expected to enhance ethanol dissociative adsorption and boost the amount of CO-like adsorbates at the electrocatalyst surface at the beginning of the CO 2 generation. At E Z 0.7 V vs. RHE, the degree at which the CCE decreases against the potential is rather different depending on the sweep rate: the CCE at E = 0.7 V vs. RHE is twice lower at n = 2 mV s À1 (CCE = 0.09) than at n = 10 mV s À1 (CCE = 0.18).…”
Section: Effect Of the Scan Ratementioning
confidence: 99%