1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01372.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass segregation in young stellar clusters

Abstract: We investigate the evolutionary effect of dynamical mass segregation in young stellar clusters. Dynamical mass segregation acts on a time-scale of order the relaxation time of a cluster. Although some degree of mass segregation occurs earlier, the position of massive stars in rich young clusters generally reflects the cluster's initial conditions. In particular, the positions of the massive stars in the Trapezium cluster in Orion cannot be due to dynamical mass segregation, but indicate that they formed in, or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
285
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(28 reference statements)
12
285
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hillenbrand 1997). Numerical simulations by Bonnell & Davies (1998) comparable to the cluster models studied here demonstrated that this mass segregation cannot be due to dynamical evolution of the cluster and therefore must be primordial. Following their suggestion, we initially place the most massive stellar system at the cluster centre and the three next most massive stars at random positions within a sphere of radius R = 0.6 R hm centred on the cluster centre, where R hm is the half-mass radius of the cluster.…”
Section: Methods and Cluster Setupmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Hillenbrand 1997). Numerical simulations by Bonnell & Davies (1998) comparable to the cluster models studied here demonstrated that this mass segregation cannot be due to dynamical evolution of the cluster and therefore must be primordial. Following their suggestion, we initially place the most massive stellar system at the cluster centre and the three next most massive stars at random positions within a sphere of radius R = 0.6 R hm centred on the cluster centre, where R hm is the half-mass radius of the cluster.…”
Section: Methods and Cluster Setupmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Bonnell & Davies (1998), Olczak et al (2011), Huff & Stahler (2006). It is currently unclear whether clusters are primordially mass-segregated or not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distribution develops within 1 Myr, the estimated age of the ONC, to the stellar distribution observed for the ONC today (Olczak et al 2006). Following the approach by Bonnell & Davies (1998), initially the four most massive stars have been placed in the inner cluster region with r seg = 0.6 · r hm , where r hm is the half-mass radius of the cluster. We model clusters of different density by keeping the size of the cluster constant (r cluster = 2.5 pc) and varying the initial number of stars N stars .…”
Section: Cluster Modelsmentioning
confidence: 91%