1989
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890815)64:4<962::aid-cncr2820640432>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass screening for cervical cancer in taiwan from 1974 to 1984

Abstract: The cervical cancer screening program in Taiwan was carried out in two phases. This study focused on the first 10-year screening program. Univariate descriptive analysis with chi-square test and multivariate analysis with logistic regression were applied to find the significant risk factors related to cervical cancer in Taiwan. Comparison of Phase I and II screening revealed a cohort effect. The high examination rate in women aged 30 to 39 years in Phase I resulted in a drop in the suspicious rate in the 35 to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such reductions following implementation of screening have been well documented (Peto et al, 2004;Bray et al, 2005). In Taiwan, Pap smear screening was initiated in December 1974 when the Cancer Society of the Republic of China together with gynaecological clinics offered free Pap tests in 1974Pap tests in -1984 Although the programme was advertised through the mass media, only 2.4% of women in the first and 4.5% of women in the second 5 years were screened (Chou and Chen, 1989). The National Labor Insurance began to reimburse the Pap test for all women working in the private and public sectors in 1991, and the national screening programme reimbursed by the National Department of Health was implemented in 1992 with an aim to reimburse Pap tests for 2% of the women population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such reductions following implementation of screening have been well documented (Peto et al, 2004;Bray et al, 2005). In Taiwan, Pap smear screening was initiated in December 1974 when the Cancer Society of the Republic of China together with gynaecological clinics offered free Pap tests in 1974Pap tests in -1984 Although the programme was advertised through the mass media, only 2.4% of women in the first and 4.5% of women in the second 5 years were screened (Chou and Chen, 1989). The National Labor Insurance began to reimburse the Pap test for all women working in the private and public sectors in 1991, and the national screening programme reimbursed by the National Department of Health was implemented in 1992 with an aim to reimburse Pap tests for 2% of the women population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Taiwanese women, however, uterine cancer is reported to be the leading cause of cancer mortality (Chou & Chen, 1989). In fact, Chou and Chen (1989) report that for women who were rescreened for cancer, the risk of cervical cancer was related to the number of pregnancies and to lower educational level. Thus, further research with the CMT might need to take into account such variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Taiwan, rapid advances in industrialization since the 1940s have been accompanied by substantial environmental and occupational pollution, which, in addition to ubiquitous cigarette smoking, have resulted in a high incidence of lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer death (Tsai, Perng, & Huang, 1988). In Taiwanese women, however, uterine cancer is reported to be the leading cause of cancer mortality (Chou & Chen, 1989). In fact, Chou and Chen (1989) report that for women who were rescreened for cancer, the risk of cervical cancer was related to the number of pregnancies and to lower educational level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No Canadian studies were located. Seven studies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] were directed at all women living in cities/regions/counties or tribes, while the others were aimed at selected women within an area. Participants in 10 of the studies were disadvantaged [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] (e.g., low income, poorly educated); however, in 8 studies, the samples were poorly described.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%