2021
DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-18669-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass of different snow crystal shapes derived from fall speed measurements

Abstract: Abstract. Meteorological forecast and climate models require good knowledge of the microphysical properties of hydrometeors and the atmospheric snow and ice crystals in clouds, for instance, their size, cross-sectional area, shape, mass, and fall speed. Especially shape is an important parameter in that it strongly affects the scattering properties of ice particles and consequently their response to remote sensing techniques. The fall speed and mass of ice particles are other important parameters for both nume… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using assumptions about fall velocity or an aggregation and riming model as a reference, the particle mass-size and/or density relationship can also be inferred from in situ observations. (Tiira et al, 2016;von Lerber et al, 2017;Pettersen et al, 2020;Tokay et al, 2021;Leinonen et al, 2021;Vázquez-Martín et al, 2021a). Various attempts have been made to classify particle types and identify active snowfall formation processes using various machine learning techniques (Nurzyńska et al, 2013;Grazioli et al, 2014;Praz et al, 2017;Hicks and Notaroš, 2019;Leinonen and Berne, 2020;Del Guasta, 2022); these classifications are needed to support quantification of snowfall formation processes (Grazioli et al, 2017;Moisseev et al, 2017;Dunnavan et al, 2019;Pasquier et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using assumptions about fall velocity or an aggregation and riming model as a reference, the particle mass-size and/or density relationship can also be inferred from in situ observations. (Tiira et al, 2016;von Lerber et al, 2017;Pettersen et al, 2020;Tokay et al, 2021;Leinonen et al, 2021;Vázquez-Martín et al, 2021a). Various attempts have been made to classify particle types and identify active snowfall formation processes using various machine learning techniques (Nurzyńska et al, 2013;Grazioli et al, 2014;Praz et al, 2017;Hicks and Notaroš, 2019;Leinonen and Berne, 2020;Del Guasta, 2022); these classifications are needed to support quantification of snowfall formation processes (Grazioli et al, 2017;Moisseev et al, 2017;Dunnavan et al, 2019;Pasquier et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%