Mass Imprisonment across the Rural-Urban Interface

Abstract

Academic work on crime and punishment has focused mostly on urban centers, leaving rural communities understudied, except for acknowledgement that rural communities warehouse a large number of prisoners and that rural prisons provide jobs and economic development for some struggling communities. This study uses a novel dataset that includes information on the home addresses of all prisoners in Arkansas from 1993 to 2003 to document imprisonment rates and racial disparities in imprisonment rates across metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties. We show how rural communities both receive and produce prisoners and that imprisonment and racial disparities in imprisonment vary more within different types of communities than across different types of communities. Further, we find that nonmetropolitan rates of imprisonment are higher than would be expected, based on observed local risk factors such as poverty rate. We close with a discussion of what these findings illustrate about concentrated disadvantage across the rural-urban interface.

Policing Through Subsidized Firepower: An Assessment of Rational Choice and Minority Threat Explanations of Police Participation in the 1033 Program*

“…We address this concern using linear interpolation to calculate year‐by‐year measures between the Census and ACS data points. This approach constructs new data points for observations between two or more known data points and is common strategy for handling the years between the Census and ACS in demographic (Crowder, Pais, and South, ; Ludwig et al., ) and criminological research (Eason, Zucker, and Wildeman, ; Parker, Mancik, and Stansfield, ; Xie and McDowall, ) . The second source of missing data is agency nonparticipation in UCR or LEOKA.…”

Structural discrimination and social stigma among individuals incarcerated for sexual offenses: Reentry across the rural–urban continuum

“…Despite the breadth of scholarship on crime and place, extant work has been focused on individuals returning from prison to urban communities, limiting the understanding of whether similar processes occur in other places, such as rural contexts. Criminologists have begun to address the urban–rural gap (Eason, Zucker, & Wildeman, ; Miller, ; Ojha, Pape, & Burek, ), but the call for more research on the “urban–rural dimension” made by Osgood and Chambers (, p. 82) two decades ago remains unanswered.…”

Jailing Immigrant Detainees: A National Study of County Participation in Immigration Detention, 1983–2013

“…Much of this research has focused on the relationship between labor market conditions in urban areas and mass incarceration. More recently, however, a growing number of scholars have advanced compelling theoretical and empirical reasons to explore this relationship in nonmetropolitan settings as well (Eason et al ; Simes ).…”