2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass ejection from neutron star mergers: different components and expected radio signals

Abstract: In addition to producing a strong gravitational signal, a short gamma-ray burst (GRB), and a compact remnant, neutron star mergers eject significant masses at significant kinetic energies. This mass ejection takes place via dynamical mass ejection and a GRB jet but other processes have also been suggested: a shock-breakout material, a cocoon resulting from the interaction of the jet with other ejecta, and viscous and neutrino driven winds from the central remnant or the accretion disk. The different components… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
137
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(109 reference statements)
2
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deceleration of this fast material by its shock interaction with the circumburst medium produces synchrotron emission peaking at MHz to GHz frequencies (Nakar & Piran 2011;Metzger & Bower 2014;Hotokezaka & Piran 2015). The synchrotron model provides a mapping from the flux densities to physical parameters of the magnetar and circumburst environment: the magnetar's rotational energy (E rot ), ejecta mass (M ej ), circumburst density (n), fractions of post-shock energy in radiating electrons (ò e ) and magnetic fields (ò B ), and the electron power-law distribution index (p) that describes the input distribution of electrons with…”
Section: Magnetar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deceleration of this fast material by its shock interaction with the circumburst medium produces synchrotron emission peaking at MHz to GHz frequencies (Nakar & Piran 2011;Metzger & Bower 2014;Hotokezaka & Piran 2015). The synchrotron model provides a mapping from the flux densities to physical parameters of the magnetar and circumburst environment: the magnetar's rotational energy (E rot ), ejecta mass (M ej ), circumburst density (n), fractions of post-shock energy in radiating electrons (ò e ) and magnetic fields (ò B ), and the electron power-law distribution index (p) that describes the input distribution of electrons with…”
Section: Magnetar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, follow-up observations with UV, optical, and infrared telescopes found a kilonova (Abbott et al 2017a;Arcavi et al 2017;Coulter et al 2017;Cowperthwaite et al 2017;Smartt et al 2017;Tanaka et al 2017;Valenti et al 2017) emitting from the mildly relativistic ejecta (Lattimer & Schramm 1974;Rosswog et al 1999;Hotokezaka et al 2013) as expected in advance (Li & Paczyński 1998;Metzger et al 2010;Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013). The ejected material will form a shock propagating in the circumbinary medium (CBM), and electromagnetic signals on a timescale of a few years have been predicted (Nakar & Piran 2011;Piran et al 2013;Rosswog et al 2013;Takami et al 2014;Hotokezaka & Piran 2015;Hotokezaka et al 2016). Electrons are accelerated at the shock and emit nonthermal synchrotron photons from the radio to X-ray range, which is the mildly relativistic counterpart to the emission from the supernova remnant (nonrelativistic) or the gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow (ultrarelativistic).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faber et al 2006;Nakar 2007;Giacomazzo et al 2013;Berger 2014;Ruiz et al 2016;Kathirgamaraju et al 2017), cocoon prompt emission (Gottlieb et al 2017a;Lazzati et al 2017a,b;Nakar & Piran 2017), jet/cocoon afterglows (e.g. Gottlieb et al 2017a;Lamb & Kobayashi 2017;Lazzati et al 2017a;Nakar & Piran 2017), and kilonovae (also referred to as "macronovae", Li & Paczyński 1998;Kulkarni 2005;Metzger et al 2010;Metzger & Berger 2012;Kasen et al 2013;Hotokezaka & Piran 2015;Gottlieb et al 2017a;Nakar & Piran 2017). A late-time (year-scaled) radio signal might originate from the ejectamedium interaction as the ejecta enters the Sedov-Taylor phase (Nakar & Piran 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%