2009
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/46/3/018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass determination with the magnetic levitation method—proposal for a new design of electromechanical system

Abstract: The method for realization of the kilogram using 'superconducting magnetic levitation' was re-evaluated at MIKES. The realization of the kilogram based on the traditional levitation method is limited by the imperfections of the superconducting materials and the indefinable dependence between supplied electrical energy and the gravitational potential energy of the superconducting mass. This indefiniteness is proportional to the applied magnetic field and is caused by increasing losses and trapped magnetic fluxe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Center for Metrology and Accreditation (MIKES) in Finland continues some of the research, but a comment in [88] reasserted that trapped flux among other things would limit the relative uncertainty at much greater than 10 −8 . A follow up proposal in [89] re-evaluates the earlier system to solve some problems, especially the energy losses in the levitation from tapped flux.…”
Section: Superconducting Magnetic Levitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Center for Metrology and Accreditation (MIKES) in Finland continues some of the research, but a comment in [88] reasserted that trapped flux among other things would limit the relative uncertainty at much greater than 10 −8 . A follow up proposal in [89] re-evaluates the earlier system to solve some problems, especially the energy losses in the levitation from tapped flux.…”
Section: Superconducting Magnetic Levitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic mass comparators are usually used for calibrating high accuracy weights all over the world. The repeatability and linearity of electronic mass comparators are good for meeting the calibration requirement of over class F 1 weights, except for mass comparators with a maximum capacity of more than 500 kg [ 1 , 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%