2008
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2008-10640-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass dependence of the surface δ-interaction strength for two-particle (two-hole) multiplets

Abstract: Abstract. By using the surface δ-interaction, the lowest states in nuclei of atomic mass number 6 ≤ A ≤ 210 with a doubly magic core and two valence nucleons are investigated. A single parameter describes the strength of the multiplet splitting of the lowest configuration which includes the ground state. The dependence of the strength on the atomic mass number of the doubly magic core is determined as a power law function A −f with an exponent f =

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…∼ E x < 7.0 MeV SM calculations using the SDI [15] predict the multiplet splitting of 1p1h configurations. It also explains the ground state of even-even nuclei to have spin 0 + because of the large down shift in the multiplet splitting with two nucleons in the same orbit [15,16].…”
Section: Configurations At 6 <mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…∼ E x < 7.0 MeV SM calculations using the SDI [15] predict the multiplet splitting of 1p1h configurations. It also explains the ground state of even-even nuclei to have spin 0 + because of the large down shift in the multiplet splitting with two nucleons in the same orbit [15,16].…”
Section: Configurations At 6 <mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Figures 22, 23 show some spectra. In contrast to the simple triangle method [40] the advanced features of GASPAN were used to fit the contamination peaks from 12 C(p, p ), 16 O(p, p ), 208 Pb(p, d), and 208 Pb(p, t) with different peak widths. By this manner more levels of 208 Pb could be resolved in the neighborhood of the contaminations than found by Glöckner [39].…”
Section: Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the values of V 0 and F 0 (nl) do not depend on J, the structure of the GSM can be determined from the ratio of the energies of levels with different values of J, to the known experimental value of the excitation energy, for example, E(2 + ) [9] or E(J max ), where J max = 2 j − 1 [10]. However, the GSM structure can be calculated using the ground state energy shift ∆E 0 , defined by the even-odd staggering effect: ∆E 0 = ∆ nn(pp) = 2∆ n(p) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%