2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass balance monitoring of geological CO2 storage with a superconducting gravimeter — A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2c. The uncertainty of the residual gravity after reduction of environmental noise is estimated to be 0.5 μGal 39,40 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2c. The uncertainty of the residual gravity after reduction of environmental noise is estimated to be 0.5 μGal 39,40 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iGrav SG was installed in October 2011 at the University of Calgary 51 . Portability and sensitivity tests were conducted over the next six months, where an accuracy of better than 1 µGal was achieved after a successful reduction of environmental effects 39,40 . The SG was deployed in July 2012 at the Natural Resources Canada (NRCan)'s PGC located on Vancouver Island near Sidney in British Columbia, Canada.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After time‐lapse borehole measurements were proposed, their feasibility was assessed at the Cranfield site in the United States . Several simulation studies have assessed the availability of gravimetric techniques for monitoring CO 2 storage …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Several simulation studies have assessed the availability of gravimetric techniques for monitoring CO 2 storage. 3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In Japan, where offshore geological storage within a moderate distance from the coastline is recognized as having the greatest potential, 16,17 it is not always easy to use the gravimetric techniques described above. Ocean bottom measurements require permanently deployed benchmarks at the ocean bottom to minimize measurement uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%