2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10156-011-0032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass balance and mass loss acceleration of the Greenland ice sheet (2002 - 2011) from GRACE gravity data

Abstract: Mass balance and mass loss acceleration of the Greenland ice sheet (2002 - 2011) from GRACE gravity dataWe examine the magnitude and acceleration of the Greenland ice sheet mass loss between 2002 and 2011. We use monthly observations of time-variable gravity from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite gravity mission. The Greenland mass loss during this time period is not a constant, but accelerating with time. We have used a quadratic trend in addition to a linear trend, which is usuall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change of ice sheet mass in the whole study area slowly increases between October and April, but decreases between May and September, indicating that the ice sheet mass starts to decrease from May and increase from October. This conclusion is consistent with other scholars, but there are still some differences with regional changes, mainly due to different factors in different regions [22,23,32].…”
Section: Spatial Change Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The change of ice sheet mass in the whole study area slowly increases between October and April, but decreases between May and September, indicating that the ice sheet mass starts to decrease from May and increase from October. This conclusion is consistent with other scholars, but there are still some differences with regional changes, mainly due to different factors in different regions [22,23,32].…”
Section: Spatial Change Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, we found that the 2 dj AR for the linear model is 0.9713, which is smaller than the 0.9763 value of the quadratic one. The result agrees with those of other researchers[27,32,64].…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…The data that will be used in this study are GRACE level 2, mass concentration, which is GRACE level 3 and TRMM data as comparison data. The study area will be determined to be the division of Indonesia into grids per 10°, this is done to speed up calculations and must be done before processing the GRACE level 2 satellite data which is in the form of a spherical harmonic coefficient (Joodaki, 2014). The harmonic coefficient in question shows the integral mass given a symbol lm C and lm S (Torge, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%