1980
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(80)90272-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass and energy analysis and space-resolved measurements of ions from plasma focus devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be explained based on the collision of the more high-energy ions with the sample surface by the increasing the number of focus deposition shots which will result in formation a coarser deposited coating. It is important to note that in plasma focus device the ions are radiated in a fountain-like structure, and their energy and flux vary with their angle relative to the anode axis [25]. Therefore, different area of the film surface is expected to have different roughness.…”
Section: Results Of Afm Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be explained based on the collision of the more high-energy ions with the sample surface by the increasing the number of focus deposition shots which will result in formation a coarser deposited coating. It is important to note that in plasma focus device the ions are radiated in a fountain-like structure, and their energy and flux vary with their angle relative to the anode axis [25]. Therefore, different area of the film surface is expected to have different roughness.…”
Section: Results Of Afm Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b, the intensity of Cr (111) diffraction peak at the distance of 5 cm from the anode tip is decreased by increasing the angle from the anode axis from 0°to 15°and then to 30°. This phenomenon can explain that the ions generated at each shot in PF devices are propagated within a small solid angle around the anode axis and so the energy and flux of the ions decrease with the increase in angular positions [29]. So, an increase in the angle from the anode axis and hence, the reduction in energy and flux of the ions, lead to less growth of deposited films on the samples' surface and weaker relative intensity of Cr (111) diffraction peak is presented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The rationale behind comparing surface roughness in three areas is that, as it was also mentioned in previous part, in PF the ions are radiated in a fountain-like structure, and their energy and flux vary with their angle relative to the anode axis [44]. Thus, various areas of the deposited thin film surface are expected to have different surface roughness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…7 we found that at 8-14 cm distances from the anode tip, when the angular position of the samples from the anode axis increases from 0°to 10°to 30°, smaller relative intensities are observable for the WN (1 1 1), WN (2 0 0) and W (0 1 1) diffraction peaks. This phenomenon can be explained based on the results reported by Bertalot et al [44] who have shown that in PF, the ions generated at each shot are emitted within a small solid angle around the anode axis and their energy and flux decrease with the angle. Hence, it is predictable that at larger angles, reduced flux and energy of the ions lead to less material deposited on the substrate and therefore, smaller intensities of diffraction peaks are observed.…”
Section: Thin Film Deposition At Various Axial and Angular Positionsmentioning
confidence: 87%