2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masonry infill walls under blast loading using confined underwater blast wave generators (WBWG)

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe vulnerability of the masonry envelop under blast loading is considered critical due to the risk of loss of lives. The behaviour of masonry infill walls subjected to dynamic out-of-plane loading was experimentally investigated in this work. Using confined underwater blast wave generators (WBWG), applying the extremely high rate conversion of the explosive detonation energy into the kinetic energy of a thick water confinement, allowed a surface area distribution avoiding also the generation of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Underwater shock simulator, Cambridge University (Deshpande et al, 2006) Peak pressures (15-70 MPa); decay times (0.1-1.5 ms); the peak pressure and pulse duration can be adjusted WBWG, Portugal (Pereira et al, 2015) To test out-of-plane walls under dynamic loading; the shock wave in water is 4.5 times faster than in air, and the pressure-impulse for the shock wave in water is 15-20 times higher than in air A laboratory-scale buried charge simulator, Cambridge University (McShane et al, 2013) Internal diameter of 28 mm and height of 80 mm; to generate a flow of sand to mimic the buried explosive; the impact velocity of the sand can be up to 39 m/s DLG test, BakerRisk, USA (http:// www.bakerrisk.com/)…”
Section: Other Blast Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underwater shock simulator, Cambridge University (Deshpande et al, 2006) Peak pressures (15-70 MPa); decay times (0.1-1.5 ms); the peak pressure and pulse duration can be adjusted WBWG, Portugal (Pereira et al, 2015) To test out-of-plane walls under dynamic loading; the shock wave in water is 4.5 times faster than in air, and the pressure-impulse for the shock wave in water is 15-20 times higher than in air A laboratory-scale buried charge simulator, Cambridge University (McShane et al, 2013) Internal diameter of 28 mm and height of 80 mm; to generate a flow of sand to mimic the buried explosive; the impact velocity of the sand can be up to 39 m/s DLG test, BakerRisk, USA (http:// www.bakerrisk.com/)…”
Section: Other Blast Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…variables. Based on previous studies (Khalil, Etman, Atta, & Essam, 2016;Kupfer, Hilsdorf, & Rusch, 1969;Pereira, Campos, & Lourenço, 2015), CDP parameters were used to model the masonry and ECC sheet as they precisely account the nonlinear material behavior. It assumes that the failure of masonry and ECC can be modeled using the plasticity characteristics and response to uniaxial compression and uniaxial tension.…”
Section: Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hydraulic blasting involves complex blasting procedures and limitations are imposed on borehole sealing technology and equipment. For these reasons, the application of hydraulic blasting to coal mine production is not fully understood [13,16]. It is very urgent to improve the blasting technique in coal mine production, so as to achieve a low-cost, high-performance presplitting blasting effect of coal rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%