1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00986573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masonry as structured continuum

Abstract: A structured continuum model is formulated to describe the behaviour of block masonry modelled as distinct rigid body systems with elastic interfaces. A correspondence between the two motions is obtained by postulating a relationship between the displacement fields of the continuum and the discrete models. The constitutive functions for the dynamic actions of the continuum are derived by equating the power of the two models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
52
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for this class of composites the classical (Cauchy) homogenization may have disadvantages and non-local constitutive models may be necessary to include geometric and 3 material length scales to appreciate the influence of block size and of high stress and strain gradients (see for instance Bacigalupo and Gambarotta, 2011, 2012, 2014. The rotational degrees of freedom of the blocks suggests to consider the Cosserat model as equivalent continuum and accordingly homogenization techniques in the static field have been proposed for blocky rocks (Mühlhaus, 1993), granular regularly packed materials (see Kruyt, 2003, Li et al, 2010, among the others) and periodic masonry (Masiani et al, 1995, Trovalusci and Masiani, 2003, Pau and Trovalusci, 2012, Baraldi et al, 2015, among the others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for this class of composites the classical (Cauchy) homogenization may have disadvantages and non-local constitutive models may be necessary to include geometric and 3 material length scales to appreciate the influence of block size and of high stress and strain gradients (see for instance Bacigalupo and Gambarotta, 2011, 2012, 2014. The rotational degrees of freedom of the blocks suggests to consider the Cosserat model as equivalent continuum and accordingly homogenization techniques in the static field have been proposed for blocky rocks (Mühlhaus, 1993), granular regularly packed materials (see Kruyt, 2003, Li et al, 2010, among the others) and periodic masonry (Masiani et al, 1995, Trovalusci and Masiani, 2003, Pau and Trovalusci, 2012, Baraldi et al, 2015, among the others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correspondence would be ideal in the case of an equivalent Cosserat continuum with a diagonal elastic tensor as proposed in [Masiani et al 1995;Sulem and Mühlhaus 1997].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model works at the macroscale, without the need of describing the effective texture geometry with the mesh; this is the essential difference with respect to the classical continuum approach usually adopted in finite element models, which generally require to describing the geometry of the material microstructure, except when adopting a generalised continuum [Masiani et al 1995]. Clearly, in the present formulation the springs should be as much as possible aligned with the principal axes of the material texture, otherwise a good approximation cannot be taken for granted.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Alternatively, they could be treated as continuum models, usually obtained by homogenization techniques: the Cauchy continuum, the Cosserat continuum and higher order continua [17][18][19] are examples of this approach. At the macro-scale level there have been performed either linear analyses [20][21][22], or nonlinear analyses, which take into account damage phenomena [23,24] or even limit analyses [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%