2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00477-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masonry arch collapse loads and mechanisms by heuristically seeded genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It makes use of an optimisation function named "Solver", which allows for the selection of a GRG (Generalised Reduced Gradient) engine, towards the solution of smooth non-linear optimisation problems. Similar, independent numerical tools of thrust-line or limit analysis, which may as well involve the use of spreadsheets and formulations of mathematical programming have been proposed [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. An approach that shall be quite similar to the present one has been earlier developed by De Rosa and Galizia [34], for the analysis of pointed masonry arches.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It makes use of an optimisation function named "Solver", which allows for the selection of a GRG (Generalised Reduced Gradient) engine, towards the solution of smooth non-linear optimisation problems. Similar, independent numerical tools of thrust-line or limit analysis, which may as well involve the use of spreadsheets and formulations of mathematical programming have been proposed [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. An approach that shall be quite similar to the present one has been earlier developed by De Rosa and Galizia [34], for the analysis of pointed masonry arches.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [47], Ponterosso et al present a heuristic GA to optimize collapse loads of masonry arches, which improves the results of the standard GA. Spallino and Thierauf [48] use evolution strategies for the optimal design of laminated composite subject to thermal buckling with stress and contiguity of layers constraints, comparing two methods of constraint handling: discarding infeasible solutions and a penalty function. Sziveri et al [49] present an improved sub-domain generation method (SGM) by inserting a new nonconvex bisection procedure and a new optimization module based on GAs.…”
Section: The Early Two-thousandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…de todos estos tipos se han utilizado en el intento de resolver problemas estructurales. Por ejemplo,Lagaros et al (2002) aplican 17 GA y ES al dimensionado óptimo de elementos estructurales;Kaveh et al (2004a),Kaveh et al (2004b),Kaveh et al (2007) yKaveh et al (2008) aplican GA y ACO al análisis de la formación de mecanismos en pórticos planos.En un terreno mucho más cercano a esta tesis, varios autores los han propuesto para el análisis de arcos:Fishwick et al (2000) yPonterosso et al (2000) mediante GA, y vanParys et al (2008)…”
unclassified