2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-017-1154-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maslov-Type Indices and Linear Stability of Elliptic Euler Solutions of the Three-Body Problem

Abstract: In this paper, we use the central configuration coordinate decomposition to study the linearized Hamiltonian system near the 3-body elliptic Euler solutions. Then using the Maslov-type ω-index theory of symplectic paths and the theory of linear operators we compute the ω-indices and obtain certain properties of linear stability of the Euler elliptic solutions of the classical three-body problem.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We paraphrase their results in our notations. For details, readers may refer to [38] for details. When α, β > 0, the operator A(α, β, e) can be written as…”
Section: The ω-Index Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We paraphrase their results in our notations. For details, readers may refer to [38] for details. When α, β > 0, the operator A(α, β, e) can be written as…”
Section: The ω-Index Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, we have ±1 ∈ σ(M 1 ). Then by Lemma 5.6 in Appendix 5.2 of [38], we have M 1 = D(−2) or M 1 = R(θ) for some θ ∈ (0, π) ∪ (π, 2π). If M 1 = D(−2), by the properties of splitting Theorem 7.11.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will consider a family of periodic Sturm-Liouville operators A(β, e) = − d 2 dt 2 − 1 + Then it is self-adjoint. Such an operator was studied in [3], [11] and [13]. We conclude their main results here: (1) If β > 1, A(β, e) is positive definite on D(ω, 2π); (2) A(1, e) is positive definite on D(ω, 2π) when ω = 1;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We prove first that i ω (γ β,e ) = 0 when β is near 1. By Lemma 4.1(ii) in [13], A(1, e) is positive definite on D(ω, 2π) when ω = 1. Therefore, there exists an ǫ > 0 small enough, which may depends on e and ω, such that A(β, e) is also positive definite on D(ω, 2π) when 1 − ǫ < β ≤ 1.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 89%