1995
DOI: 10.2307/3034576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masks and the Semiotics of Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of the participants supported the theories and thoughts of engagement from anthropology in relation to the semiotics and identity potential inherent in masks (Pollock, 1995). Participants noted increased awareness of identity, group cohesion and a shared collegiality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response of the participants supported the theories and thoughts of engagement from anthropology in relation to the semiotics and identity potential inherent in masks (Pollock, 1995). Participants noted increased awareness of identity, group cohesion and a shared collegiality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This functionality of purpose is separate from the effect on the spectator. Anthropologically, the mask works as a metaphor or signifier for the spectator to separate the individual performer and distance that perception to allow an alienation effect that, in turn, allows a suspension of disbelief (Pollock, 1995). In simplistic terms, through forcing the spectator to accept the necessity for the suspension of disbelief, the spectator can willingly immerse him/herself in the message and meaning of the spectacle and performance, creating their own meaning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On masks as agents in social control and cohesion, see Pernet 1992, 79. 138 Inomata andCoben 2006, 30. 139Pernet 1992,1-22; see also Pollock 1995. 140Napier 1986.…”
Section: The Performers: Masks Theriomorphs and Kingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Research has proved that there are major differences between literate societies and societies with oral literacy. These differences manifest themselves in a variety of ways, especially in terms of how the body and society remembers, creates, structures and perceives the world (Ong 1982;Classen 1993;Pollock 1995). Again, whereas literate societies place an emphasis on the visual, other societies may use other forms of bodily senses as their focal vehicles of identity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How may the bodily senses and organs have been used to structure the world, and to remember? Was there a reliance on the oral and aural, as with the Kulina in South America (Pollock 1995), or the olfactory, as with the Ongee of the Andaman Islands (Classen 1993), or on temperature, as with the Totzil of Mexico (Classen 1993; cf. Haaland 2004)?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%