1975
DOI: 10.3758/bf03337620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masking effectiveness of disks varying in duration and in number of internal segments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visibility of the Wrst stimulus (the test stimulus) is then impaired by the second stimulus (the mask). This impairment can be a reduction of the perceived brightness (e.g., Alpern, 1953;Blanc-Garin, 1966;Fry, 1934;Growney, Weisstein, & Cox, 1977;Piéron, 1935), an increased threshold for the test stimulus (e.g., Cox & Dember, 1970;Kolers, 1962;Lefton & Orr, 1975), its reduced discriminability (e.g., Bernstein, Proctor, Proctor, & Schurman, 1973;Breitmeyer, Love, & Wepman, 1974;Weisstein & Haber, 1965) or identiWability (e.g., Dember, Bryant, & Chambers, 1975;McKeever & Suberi, 1974;Mewhort, Hearty, & Powell, 1978;Schurman, 1972) or simply that it has phenomenally disappeared (e.g., Burchard & Lawson, 1973;Kolers & Rosner, 1960;Mayzner, Tresselt, & Helfer, 1967;Toch, 1956;Werner, 1935).…”
Section: Introduction (See Endnote 1)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The visibility of the Wrst stimulus (the test stimulus) is then impaired by the second stimulus (the mask). This impairment can be a reduction of the perceived brightness (e.g., Alpern, 1953;Blanc-Garin, 1966;Fry, 1934;Growney, Weisstein, & Cox, 1977;Piéron, 1935), an increased threshold for the test stimulus (e.g., Cox & Dember, 1970;Kolers, 1962;Lefton & Orr, 1975), its reduced discriminability (e.g., Bernstein, Proctor, Proctor, & Schurman, 1973;Breitmeyer, Love, & Wepman, 1974;Weisstein & Haber, 1965) or identiWability (e.g., Dember, Bryant, & Chambers, 1975;McKeever & Suberi, 1974;Mewhort, Hearty, & Powell, 1978;Schurman, 1972) or simply that it has phenomenally disappeared (e.g., Burchard & Lawson, 1973;Kolers & Rosner, 1960;Mayzner, Tresselt, & Helfer, 1967;Toch, 1956;Werner, 1935).…”
Section: Introduction (See Endnote 1)mentioning
confidence: 98%