2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masking autoprocessing of Clostridium difficile toxin A by the C-terminus combined repetitive oligo peptides

Abstract: Clostridium difficile toxin A and B (TcdA and TcdB) are the major virulence factors of the bacterium, both of which consist of two enzymatic domains: an effector glucosyltransferase domain (GTD) and a cysteine protease domain (CPD) responsible for autocleavage and release of GTD. Although the CPDs from both toxins share a similar structure and mechanism of hexakisphosphate (InsP6) -induced activation, TcdA is substantially less sensitive to the autocleavage as compared with TcdB. In this study, we provided evi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1d) indicates that the CROPS extends from the base of the APD and could impact InsP6 binding. This is consistent with reports that the CROPS interacts with N-terminal sequences of TcdA to repress autoprocessing activity 22,23 and our observation that a shorter construct (TcdA 1795 ) undergoes autoprocessing more efficiently than TcdA and TcdA 1832 (Supplementary Fig. 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…1d) indicates that the CROPS extends from the base of the APD and could impact InsP6 binding. This is consistent with reports that the CROPS interacts with N-terminal sequences of TcdA to repress autoprocessing activity 22,23 and our observation that a shorter construct (TcdA 1795 ) undergoes autoprocessing more efficiently than TcdA and TcdA 1832 (Supplementary Fig. 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on negative stain data and crystal structures of TcdA and TcdB domains ( Chumbler et al, 2016 ), as well as reports about intramolecular association of the C-terminal domain with the N-terminal part of TcdA ( Olling et al, 2014 ; Zhang et al, 2015 ), we hypothesized that the conserved cysteine 2236 in TcdA and the homologous 2232 in TcdB contribute to the conformation of toxins. Cysteine 2232 is located in an exposed region of the CROP domain which might interact with the upstream located delivery domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TcdB2 deletion mutant retains glucosylation activity. Previous work has suggested that the efficiency of glucosylation of TcdA and TcdB is hindered by conformational restrictions within the proteins (16,20). It was therefore predicted that deletions which remove conformational constraints in TcdB could result in forms of the protein with altered glucosylation activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the structural reasons for it are not understood, biochemical evidence suggests that the carboxy-terminal region of the toxin influences autoprocessing. Interestingly, Zhang et al showed that swapping the CROP domain of TcdB with that of TcdA caused the toxin to become more resistant to IP6-induced autoprocessing (20). Moreover, a deletion mutant of TcdA containing only the first 1,056 amino acids undergoes more efficient and nearly complete autoprocessing compared with that for the full-length toxin (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%