2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39634-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MaSh: Machine Learning for Sledgehammer

Abstract: Sledgehammer integrates automatic theorem provers in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. A key component, the relevance filter, heuristically ranks the thousands of facts available and selects a subset, based on syntactic similarity to the current goal. We introduce MaSh, an alternative that learns from successful proofs. New challenges arose from our "zero-click" vision: MaSh should integrate seamlessly with the users' workflow, so that they benefit from machine learning without having to install software, set … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An earlier version of this work was presented at the ITP 2013 conference [23]. Since then, the naive Bayes algorithm has been ported from Python to Standard ML, to improve efficiency and reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier version of this work was presented at the ITP 2013 conference [23]. Since then, the naive Bayes algorithm has been ported from Python to Standard ML, to improve efficiency and reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This optimization may lose some constant features (e.g., if induced by a unification at a reduce step), however it very significantly speeds up the advising. Given that the features of the current path are f , the relevance of the eligible contrapositives (pre-selected by the lit indexing) is then computed according to the following modified naive-Bayes score (used by us for axiom selection in [11]):…”
Section: Learning-based Advising System and Related Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As common in such evaluations [6,8,12] the most complementary methods are computed by a greedy algorithm, and the resulting greedy sequences are shown from top to bottom in the table. The total improvement is in this case 6.2%, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%