Masculinity without Conflict

Stone, Rachel

doi:10.1057/9780230307254.0010

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Instead, the creation in the period of the image of the good Christian layman encouraged a more inclusive ideal of masculinity. 119 It also reduced the expression of misogyny: Carolingian patriarchy, relatively united and secure, did not need to stress the inferiority of women. 120 Power remained male, including in marital disputes, although this may not have consoled those individual men who were unable to exert their power successfully.…”

Section: Marriage and Powermentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Bound from Either Side’: The Limits of Power in Carolingian Marriage Disputes, 840–870

Stone

2007

Gender & History

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses four marriage disputes in ninth‐century Francia which involved noblemen: Count Stephen of the Auvergne, Count Boso of Italy, Baldwin of Flanders and the royal vassal Falcric. All these men were affected by Carolingian reforming measures on consanguineous marriage, divorce and raptus (abduction). The article examines how gender and social status affected the forms of power and the strategies used by different parties in the cases: archbishops and popes, kings, the women involved and the noblemen themselves. A paradoxical situation is revealed: despite the patriarchal basis of Carolingian society, the power even of elite men over women and marriage was often highly contingent. Yet such restrictions on power did not imperil the gender order: the masculinity of the men involved in these marriage disputes was not questioned.

show abstract

Section: Marriage and Powermentioning

confidence: 99%