1972
DOI: 10.2307/40126177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mary Stuart. Eine historische Szene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ROSAT pointed observations of γ-Cas revealed a factor 3 variability of the (0.1-2.4 keV) band flux on a time scale of a few hours. However, the average PSPC count rate changed by only a factor ∼ 1.5 between all-sky survey and pointed observations (Haberl 1995). Therefore, our lower limit of 2.7 on the soft band long term variability of HD 157832 is in principle compatible with what is observed from γ-Cas, but could also indicate a much larger variation of the soft X-ray flux.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…ROSAT pointed observations of γ-Cas revealed a factor 3 variability of the (0.1-2.4 keV) band flux on a time scale of a few hours. However, the average PSPC count rate changed by only a factor ∼ 1.5 between all-sky survey and pointed observations (Haberl 1995). Therefore, our lower limit of 2.7 on the soft band long term variability of HD 157832 is in principle compatible with what is observed from γ-Cas, but could also indicate a much larger variation of the soft X-ray flux.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The nature of this companion is, however, not well constrained. The companion was speculated to be a white dwarf (Haberl 1995), a NS (e.g., Postnov et al 2017), or a He star (e.g., Langer et al 2020b). A recent study by Borre et al (2020) studied the long-term variations of the Hα profile and found indications that a spiral structure in the circumstellar decretion disk is in phase with the companion.…”
Section: B2 Binaries With Unknown Uncertain or Debated Companionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to an accreting NS, WDs are expected to show hard X-ray emission powered by accretion, but at lower luminosity of 10 29−33 erg s −1 , compared to 10 34−38 erg s −1 for NSs (Waters et al 1989). Suggested candidates are γ Cas like objects (Haberl 1995;Lopes de Oliveira et al 2006). In addition, nuclear burning on the WD surface can produce super-soft X-ray emission at luminosities of 10 35−38 erg s −1 , which might be absorbed by the decretion disc in most cases, complicating the discovery of such systems (Apparao 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%