2009
DOI: 10.1080/02533950903076139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marx, labour and emancipation in South African sociology: a preliminary rethinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in the preceding reviews, some sociologists bemoan a lack of what Sitas (2010) calls 'a real sociology of practice sensitive to the social dynamics and aspirations of the local population', another sociologist, Bernard Dubbeld (2009), mounts an even stronger criticism of South African sociology as lacking radical, emancipatory theory. Marxistinspired industrial sociology in South Africa, he argues, provides a limited interpretation of Marx's theory of capitalism.…”
Section: The Decline Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While in the preceding reviews, some sociologists bemoan a lack of what Sitas (2010) calls 'a real sociology of practice sensitive to the social dynamics and aspirations of the local population', another sociologist, Bernard Dubbeld (2009), mounts an even stronger criticism of South African sociology as lacking radical, emancipatory theory. Marxistinspired industrial sociology in South Africa, he argues, provides a limited interpretation of Marx's theory of capitalism.…”
Section: The Decline Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He argues that South African sociologists provide simplistic accounts, shying away from broader enquiries into questions of the relationship between society, politics and structural transformations. Instead, they have become functionalist in orientation, presenting Marx to students in summary forms, yet flying the flag of radical sociology (Dubbeld, 2009: 218). Dubbeld is not alone in such criticism.…”
Section: The Decline Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%