2017
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2017.2752750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MARTA GANs: Unsupervised Representation Learning for Remote Sensing Image Classification

Abstract: Abstract-With the development of deep learning, supervised learning has frequently been adopted to classify remotely sensed images using convolutional networks (CNNs). However, due to the limited amount of labeled data available, supervised learning is often difficult to carry out. Therefore, we proposed an unsupervised model called multiple-layer feature-matching generative adversarial networks (MARTA GANs) to learn a representation using only unlabeled data. MARTA GANs consists of both a generative model G a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
159
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with other deep models, the proposed method can obtain comparable results. The proposed method can obtain 87.74% which is better than 86% obtained by CNN-1 [19] and 87.69% by MARTA GANs without data augmentation [1], [18]. It can obtain comparable results when compared with UCFFN (87.83%).…”
Section: Results Over the Brazilian Coffee Scene Datasetmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When compared with other deep models, the proposed method can obtain comparable results. The proposed method can obtain 87.74% which is better than 86% obtained by CNN-1 [19] and 87.69% by MARTA GANs without data augmentation [1], [18]. It can obtain comparable results when compared with UCFFN (87.83%).…”
Section: Results Over the Brazilian Coffee Scene Datasetmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Accuracy(%) Dense SIFT [14] 81.67 ± 1.23 SPCK++ [15] 76.05 UFL-SC [16] 90.26 ± 1.51 COPD [17] 91.33 ± 1.11 MARTA GANs (without data augmentation) [1], [18] 85.37 CNN-1 [19] 84.53 UCFFN [1] 88.57 Proposed Method 94.33 ± 1.06…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other related works such as [44] also report measures that derive from the confusion matrix, in which the Bradley-Terry Model was used to quantify association in remotely sensed images. In order for fair comparison with the reported results in previous remote sensing image classification works [19,32,[35][36][37], we adopt the same accuracy assessment measures used in the above literature. Table 1 shows the overall accuracy of classification results for different remote sensing image feature learning methods.…”
Section: Results For Remote Sensing Scene Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Deep Convolutional GANs (DCGANs) [38] were designed to allow the network to generate data with similar internal structure as training data, improving the quality of the generated images, and Conditional GANs [39] add an additional conditioning variable to both the generator and the discriminator. Based on the previous architectures the concept of GANs has been adopted to solve many computer visions related tasks such as image generation [40,41], image super-resolution [42], unsupervised learning [43], semi-supervised learning [44], and image painting and colorization [45,46].…”
Section: Generative Adversarial Network (Gans)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of remote sensing, Lin et al [43] used GANs for unsupervised scene classification. The model consists of a generator that learns to produce additional training images similar to the real data, and a discriminator that works as a feature extractor, which learns better representations of the images using the data provided by the generator.…”
Section: Generative Adversarial Network (Gans)mentioning
confidence: 99%