2019
DOI: 10.1177/1178638819827609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marshallese Beliefs, Perceptions, and Practices Related to Child Feeding Among Marshallese in the United States: Implications for Childhood Obesity

Abstract: Introduction:Obesity affects more than 40 million children globally. Efforts to promote proper nutrition in an attempt to reduce childhood obesity should consider maternal beliefs and cultural customs around food. Little is known regarding child feeding, including weaning practices and foods consumed in the first years of life among Marshallese children, a sub-group of Pacific Islanders, residing in the United States.Methods:This study aims to explore the influences on introduction of complementary foods among… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Family, tradition, and culture (social norms within the parent's environment) shaped parental infant feeding beliefs and perceptions about when to begin complementary feeding, and what first foods to offer. Of the studies in this review addressing introduction of solid or semi-solid foods, "beliefs, values, and perceived norms" were a central influence on complementary feeding practices [43,44,49,51,55,59,85,88,89,[91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99], which brought challenges to immigrant mothers of children who were culturally separated [100,101]. Parents perceived that "everyone gives you advice" [102], and complementary feeding was viewed as a natural progression with the goal of enjoyment of food and development of an expansive palate [95].…”
Section: Infant Feeding Behaviors Are Influenced By the Socio-culturamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family, tradition, and culture (social norms within the parent's environment) shaped parental infant feeding beliefs and perceptions about when to begin complementary feeding, and what first foods to offer. Of the studies in this review addressing introduction of solid or semi-solid foods, "beliefs, values, and perceived norms" were a central influence on complementary feeding practices [43,44,49,51,55,59,85,88,89,[91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99], which brought challenges to immigrant mothers of children who were culturally separated [100,101]. Parents perceived that "everyone gives you advice" [102], and complementary feeding was viewed as a natural progression with the goal of enjoyment of food and development of an expansive palate [95].…”
Section: Infant Feeding Behaviors Are Influenced By the Socio-culturamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies targeted specific populations within the United States including a particular racial, ethnic, or socioeconomic group ( Table 3 ) or a particular maternal or infant health characteristic ( Table 2 ). Most studies sampled only mothers, although six sampled caregivers or guardians, one sampled co-parenting mothers and fathers ( Thullen et al, 2016 ), and one sampled pairs of mothers and caregivers ( Johnson et al, 2019 ). Six studies utilized nationally representative samples ( Barrera et al, 2018 ; Braid et al, 2015 ; Clayton et al, 2013 ; Gaffney et al, 2014 ; Kim & Gallien, 2016 ; Roess et al, 2018 ), but most studies (23/29) recruited from a single geographic area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This level of food insecurity among pregnant women is much higher than it has been documented in other populations [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. The previous qualitative literature with the Marshallese in Arkansas has identified a strong desire for both healthy and traditional foods and financial barriers to obtaining them [ 19 , 33 ]. This is the first article to document this qualitative concern among pregnant Marshallese and the first study among pregnant Marshallese to document the high level of food insecurity risk using Hager et al’s 2-item screening measure [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%