2016
DOI: 10.1111/iere.12160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marriage, Markets, and Money: A Coasian Theory of Household Formation

Abstract: This article integrates search‐based models of marriage and money. We think about households as organizations, the way Coase thinks about firms, as alternatives to markets that become more attractive when transactions costs increase. In the model, individuals consume market‐ and home‐produced goods, and home production is facilitated by marriage. Market frictions, including taxes, search, and bargaining problems, increase the marriage propensity. The inflation tax encourages marriage because being single is ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed in Table 3.10 that singles use cash and close substitutes such as SVC and CTC relatively more than individuals living in non-single households. This result is in line with the findings of Burdett et al (2016) suggesting that being single is cash intensive, which the authors explain by the different types of expenditures made in different types of households: goods and services associated with monetary exchange -such as dining out -are demanded in greater quantities by single than by married people. Consistently, the coefficient estimates for couple households are positive in the case of CC and DC usage.…”
Section: Regression Analysis Of Household Heterogeneitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It can be observed in Table 3.10 that singles use cash and close substitutes such as SVC and CTC relatively more than individuals living in non-single households. This result is in line with the findings of Burdett et al (2016) suggesting that being single is cash intensive, which the authors explain by the different types of expenditures made in different types of households: goods and services associated with monetary exchange -such as dining out -are demanded in greater quantities by single than by married people. Consistently, the coefficient estimates for couple households are positive in the case of CC and DC usage.…”
Section: Regression Analysis Of Household Heterogeneitysupporting
confidence: 89%