2005
DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2002.9989097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marriage form and age at first marriage: A comparative study in three counties in contemporary rural China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect in older cohorts could be due to the fact that traditionally, rural Chinese women married earlier in life than urban women, and thus commenced sexual activity earlier. This effect could be diminishing now as rural women marry later [24] and as urban women havemore risky and earlier sexual activity, including sexual partners before marriage, a trend which our data show is true for both urban and rural dwellers but is stronger among urbanites (see Table, Supplementary Digital Content 2). Thus, two modern trends combined with traditional patterns have resulted in a similar age of sexual debut among young cohorts of rural and urban Chinese women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This effect in older cohorts could be due to the fact that traditionally, rural Chinese women married earlier in life than urban women, and thus commenced sexual activity earlier. This effect could be diminishing now as rural women marry later [24] and as urban women havemore risky and earlier sexual activity, including sexual partners before marriage, a trend which our data show is true for both urban and rural dwellers but is stronger among urbanites (see Table, Supplementary Digital Content 2). Thus, two modern trends combined with traditional patterns have resulted in a similar age of sexual debut among young cohorts of rural and urban Chinese women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Women's likelihood of first marriage is much higher than that of men, irrespective of entry type. This gap is partially due to the excess number of men in the marriage market (Poston and Glover 2005) as well as the difficulty experienced by poor and low-educated men in rural areas in finding a marriage partner (Jin, Li, and Feldman 2005). To test whether our results are robust, we estimated the competing risks of first marriage entry types through the model of Fine and Gray (1999).…”
Section: Descriptive Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preference of family patterns is one of the aspects of family socio-cultural values and its practices that may affect early marriage pattern across the cultures. Family sociologists and anthropologists broadly classify family pattern into three groups: nuclear, extended and joint that are the protective or risk factors of age at first marriage in a given culture ( Jin et al, 2003;Skinner, 1997). It is protective in the sense every man acquires social values from the family of orientation (a family unit in which someone is born as a son and daughter and is reared), and then he or she forms his own family of procreation (a family unit formed by…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%