1994
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405x(94)90017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markups, quantity risk, and bidding strategies at treasury coupon auctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, a negative relationship has been found between Treasury supply and prices. Individual issue sizes are examined in Simon (1991Simon ( , 1994, Duffee (1996), and Fleming (2002) Our analysis differs from the existing literature in several ways. First, our primary interest is in dealer compensation for the risk associated with inventory changes as evidenced by future appreciation of these positions.…”
Section: Asset Pricing Effects Of Dealer Position Managementmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, a negative relationship has been found between Treasury supply and prices. Individual issue sizes are examined in Simon (1991Simon ( , 1994, Duffee (1996), and Fleming (2002) Our analysis differs from the existing literature in several ways. First, our primary interest is in dealer compensation for the risk associated with inventory changes as evidenced by future appreciation of these positions.…”
Section: Asset Pricing Effects Of Dealer Position Managementmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…First, a number of studies have shown that dealers are compensated for participating in the primary market in that Treasuries tend to be auctioned at prices lower than those in the secondary market, e.g., Cammack (1991), Spindt and Stolz (1992), and Simon (1994). Second, a negative relationship has been found between Treasury supply and prices.…”
Section: Asset Pricing Effects Of Dealer Position Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first line of studies compares the average yield bid in the auction to the yield on another instrument, which at the time of the auction is almost identical to the auctioned bond. Examples of such studies are Simon (1994), Nyborg and Sundaresan (1996) and Goldreich (2007). They find a small underpricing of treasury auction securities in the order of magnitude of a 1 basis point higher yield.…”
Section: Evidence From the Literature On Yield Effects Of Auctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short banks that do not obtain adequate funds in the auction may risk being squeezed in the interbank market; they may be charged an above fair market borrowing rate. That is, they face the loser's nightmare [Simon (1994), Nyborg and Sundaresan (1996)]. Since banks can always borrow (against collateral) at the ECB's marginal lending facility, the loser's nightmare costs a bank at most 100 basis points per unit it is short.…”
Section: The Loser's Nightmarementioning
confidence: 99%