2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2006.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov selections and their regularity for the three-dimensional stochastic Navier–Stokes equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general one can have several stationary solutions (see for example [20] I and I m ). By the same properties that ensure existence of solutions (and following similar computations, see for example [12]), it is easy to see that I is a compact subset of Ω. Moreover, by Corollary 3.2, I m and hence I e are relatively compact in a much stronger topology.…”
Section: Stationary Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In general one can have several stationary solutions (see for example [20] I and I m ). By the same properties that ensure existence of solutions (and following similar computations, see for example [12]), it is easy to see that I is a compact subset of Ω. Moreover, by Corollary 3.2, I m and hence I e are relatively compact in a much stronger topology.…”
Section: Stationary Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the framework of Markov solutions examined in this paper, the balance of energy corresponds to the a. s. supermartingale property Å¿℄ (and, more generally, of Å ℄) of Definition 2.4. As clarified in [12], the two facts 1. the balance holds only for almost every time, 2. the balance is an inequality, rather than an equality, correspond to a lack of regularity, in time in the first case and in space in the second, of solutions to the equations (1.1). From the point of view of the model, such facts translate to a loss of energy in the balance.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations