2005
DOI: 10.1214/088342305000000016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods and the Label Switching Problem in Bayesian Mixture Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
472
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 575 publications
(478 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
472
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimated the prevalence of CPTB to be 27% (95% credible interval (CrI): 21,35). The sensitivities of culture, Xpert, and smear microscopy were estimated to be 60% (95% CrI: 46, 76), 49% (95% CrI: 38, 62), and 22% (95% CrI: 16,30), respectively; specificities of these tests were estimated in accordance with prior information and were close to 100%. Chest radiography was estimated to have a sensitivity of 64% (95% CrI: 55, 73) and a specificity of 78% (95% CrI: 73, 83).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We estimated the prevalence of CPTB to be 27% (95% credible interval (CrI): 21,35). The sensitivities of culture, Xpert, and smear microscopy were estimated to be 60% (95% CrI: 46, 76), 49% (95% CrI: 38, 62), and 22% (95% CrI: 16,30), respectively; specificities of these tests were estimated in accordance with prior information and were close to 100%. Chest radiography was estimated to have a sensitivity of 64% (95% CrI: 55, 73) and a specificity of 78% (95% CrI: 73, 83).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Another approach is to treat K as an unknown parameter and to estimate it within the modeling process. While the second approach appears more appealing, there are some issues with regard to prior selection for K and the sensitivity of its posterior distribution (Aitkin, 2001;Jasra et al, 2005). For this study, we adopted the first approach since the number of components is pre-specified.…”
Section: Parameter Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructing proposal distributions by creating an approximation of the target in each dimension using fixed dimensional MCMC (Hastie, 2005 (University of Bristol PhD thesis)) is complicated by the label-switching problem (see Jasra et al (2005) for a discussion). Delayed rejection (Green & Mira, 2001) and tempered transitions (Jennison et al, 2003) often do not provide a general solution to the problems highlighted by this example.…”
Section: Alternative Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%