2002
DOI: 10.1214/aoap/1026915617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov chain decomposition for convergence rate analysis

Abstract: In this paper we develop tools for analyzing the rate at which a reversible Markov chain converges to stationarity. Our techniques are useful when the Markov chain can be decomposed into pieces which are themselves easier to analyze. The main theorems relate the spectral gap of the original Markov chains to the spectral gaps of the pieces. In the first case the pieces are restrictions of the Markov chain to subsets of the state space; the second case treats a Metropolis-Hastings chain whose equilibrium distrib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key result for this is a theorem due to Caracciolo, Pelissetto, and Sokal [2]. For more detailed discussion and a proof of this result, see Madras and Randall [20].…”
Section: Strategy Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key result for this is a theorem due to Caracciolo, Pelissetto, and Sokal [2]. For more detailed discussion and a proof of this result, see Madras and Randall [20].…”
Section: Strategy Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great progress has been made on the complexity of partition functions, giving classification theorems [16,4,19,37,6,15,5] in terms of polynomial time tractability or #P-hardness. A major further research direction is when a #P-hard partition function can be approximated [22,14,12,23,30,33,18]. Now consider the problem of counting perfect matchings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free-boundary problem was considered by Madras and Randall [11] as a possible application of their new decomposition method, but the application contained an error [12]. In [12] they stated that the free-boundary problem was still open.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%