2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63387-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov Automata with Multiple Objectives

Abstract: Abstract. Markov automata combine non-determinism, probabilistic branching, and exponentially distributed delays. This compositional variant of continuous-time Markov decision processes is used in reliability engineering, performance evaluation and stochastic scheduling. Their verification so far focused on single objectives such as (timed) reachability, and expected costs. In practice, often the objectives are mutually dependent and the aim is to reveal trade-offs. We present algorithms to analyze several obj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For multi-objective analysis, the model checking community typically focuses on probabilities and expected costs as in the seminal works [15,22]. Implementations are typically based on a value iteration approach in [24], and have been extended to stochastic games [16], Markov automata [42], and interval MDPs [28]. Other considered cases include e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multi-objective analysis, the model checking community typically focuses on probabilities and expected costs as in the seminal works [15,22]. Implementations are typically based on a value iteration approach in [24], and have been extended to stochastic games [16], Markov automata [42], and interval MDPs [28]. Other considered cases include e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It approximates the set of points (t, p) for schedules achieving that (1) the expected time to complete all jobs is at most t and (2) the probability to finish half of the jobs within an is at least p. The red area indicates the set of points (t, p) that cannot be attained by any policy, whereas the green area indicates the set of points that are achievable by some policy; the white area is the "unknown" area, due to the -approximation. Whereas for MDP model checking [72], the set of achievable points is a convex area with finitely many corner points, for CTMDPs the convex area may have infinitely many corner points [135]. This is why approximations of Pareto curves are obtained.…”
Section: Multiple Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multi-objective analysis, the model checking community typically focuses on probabilities and expected costs as in the seminal works [15,23]. Implementations are typically based on a value iteration approach as in [25], and have been extended to stochastic games [16], Markov automata [47], and interval MDPs [30]. Other considered cases include e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%