2018
DOI: 10.3390/e20080586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marking Vertices to Find Graph Isomorphism Mapping Based on Continuous-Time Quantum Walk

Abstract: The isomorphism problem involves judging whether two graphs are topologically the same and producing structure-preserving isomorphism mapping. It is widely used in various areas. Diverse algorithms have been proposed to solve this problem in polynomial time, with the help of quantum walks. Some of these algorithms, however, fail to find the isomorphism mapping. Moreover, most algorithms have very limited performance on regular graphs which are generally difficult to deal with due to their symmetry. We propose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The verification method was to test all the adjoint nodes and to see whether their mapping nodes were adjacent. This is the same with the verification method in [ 13 , 14 ]. If the result of isomorphism mapping passed the verification, it was deemed to be correct, and vice versa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The verification method was to test all the adjoint nodes and to see whether their mapping nodes were adjacent. This is the same with the verification method in [ 13 , 14 ]. If the result of isomorphism mapping passed the verification, it was deemed to be correct, and vice versa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In our experiments, 16 groups of graphs with 1585 pairs isomorphic graphs were used in total, and the datasets are the same ones referenced in [ 14 ]. We concentrated on the accuracy performance of discovering isomorphism mapping since accuracy is the key indicator of approximation algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations