2000
DOI: 10.1080/713611416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marking the Difference: An investigation of the criteria used for assessing undergraduate dissertations in a business school

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…et al 2000). Having said this, Hand and Clewes (2000) do warn against 'upward drift' of grades, and 'degree inflation' (this issue did not manifest in the findings). The final grade of the degree classification has become important to students, and with the dissertation being worth 40 credits (at the University of Huddersfield Business School), it is seen by students as a major component of that classification (Pathirage, Chaminda.…”
Section: Overview Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al 2000). Having said this, Hand and Clewes (2000) do warn against 'upward drift' of grades, and 'degree inflation' (this issue did not manifest in the findings). The final grade of the degree classification has become important to students, and with the dissertation being worth 40 credits (at the University of Huddersfield Business School), it is seen by students as a major component of that classification (Pathirage, Chaminda.…”
Section: Overview Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 'inherent quality' can be a slippery concept, as indicated by the much coined saying 'I know a 2:1 when I see it' (Ecclestone, 2001). More specifically, Hand and Clewes (2000) found evidence of the use of different criteria and approaches to marking by faculty staff when assessing the dissertation module within a final-year degree programme. Their study raised questions about the tension between individual tutor freedom and institutional demands, such as the pressure to meet marking deadlines and the demonstration of consistent assessment practice.…”
Section: Ensuring Reliable Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Rowntree (1987) explains this when he comments that all lecturers come to the act of assessment with preconceived ideas about how it is done, and one powerful source of knowledge is the lecturer's own experience of being assessed. Yorke, Bridges and Woolf (2000) and Hand and Clewes (2000) identify that lecturers draw on their past experiences of being a student to help them assess. It would be useful for HE teaching development courses or assessment staff development courses to recognise the significance of lecturers' experiences as students more directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%