2015
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2014.2353575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marking Estimation of P-Time Petri Nets With Unobservable Transitions

Abstract: This paper focuses on the problem of estimating the marking of an unlabeled P-time Petri net with partial information modeled by unobservable transitions. The proposed approach is based on a novel state observer synthesis method under partial observation. A procedure that, given a sequence of observable transitions with their firing time instants, allows to determine the set of markings consistent with the considered observation is given. The method relies on the feasibility in time (called schedulability) of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Petri nets (PNs) which is a well-suited model for discrete event systems, temporal intervals can be associated with places or transitions for Time PNs, but the corresponding subclasses ( P-Time PNs and T-Time PNs ) are fundamentally different and must not be confused. In Time PNs [16], a temporal interval of firing is associated with each transition enabled by the marking while a temporal interval of availability is associated with each token which enters a place in P-Time PNs [2] [3] [8] [9]. In this paper, we focus on P-time PNs whose evolution can undergo token deaths which express the loss of resources or parts and failures to meet time specifications.…”
Section: A Aim and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Petri nets (PNs) which is a well-suited model for discrete event systems, temporal intervals can be associated with places or transitions for Time PNs, but the corresponding subclasses ( P-Time PNs and T-Time PNs ) are fundamentally different and must not be confused. In Time PNs [16], a temporal interval of firing is associated with each transition enabled by the marking while a temporal interval of availability is associated with each token which enters a place in P-Time PNs [2] [3] [8] [9]. In this paper, we focus on P-time PNs whose evolution can undergo token deaths which express the loss of resources or parts and failures to meet time specifications.…”
Section: A Aim and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications can be found in many fields as production systems, food industry and transportation systems [7] [1] [10]. Up to now, the consideration of the time factor as intervals in P-time PNs containing conflicts and synchronizations, remains an open problem in estimation as, at the best of our knowledge, only few papers have considered this type of general model: [2] [3] provide an estimation of marking sets consistent with an observed label sequence.…”
Section: A Aim and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used satisfiability modulo theory to address the complexity of secure state estimation. Bonhomme [33] proposed a method to assess the marking of an unlabeled P-time Petri net with unobservable transitions. This method used the candidate firing sequences to estimate the marking.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems of state estimation and property verification have also drawn many attentions in the context of Petri nets. For example, state (marking) estimation algorithms for Petri nets have been proposed in [3,10,33,49]. Decidability and verification procedures for diagnosability [4,9,12,63,122], detectability [32,57], prognosability [115] and opacity [101,102] are also studied in the literature for Petri nets.…”
Section: Estimation and Verification Of Petri Nets And Stochastic Desmentioning
confidence: 99%