2008
DOI: 10.1080/15265160802116624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketing Off-Label Uses to Physicians: FDA's Draft (Mis)Guidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are thousands of peer-reviewed journals and companies' selection of articles may be biased toward those that illustrate the utility of the treatment in the most favorable light. 10 Adding reliable information in labeling would help, as FDA guidance indicates that approved labeling should be included with any peer-reviewed journal information disseminated to physicians. 9 A second argument against this alternative labeling approach is that it might discourage sponsors from obtaining reliable information, and potentially carrying out additional studies, to evaluate important secondary endpoints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are thousands of peer-reviewed journals and companies' selection of articles may be biased toward those that illustrate the utility of the treatment in the most favorable light. 10 Adding reliable information in labeling would help, as FDA guidance indicates that approved labeling should be included with any peer-reviewed journal information disseminated to physicians. 9 A second argument against this alternative labeling approach is that it might discourage sponsors from obtaining reliable information, and potentially carrying out additional studies, to evaluate important secondary endpoints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%